vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) and McCormick & Company (MKC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
McCormick & Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $20.2M, roughly 91.5× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). McCormick & Company runs the higher net margin — -27.4% vs 12.2%, a 39.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, La Rosa Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs 2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs 7.5%).
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
McCormick & Company, Incorporated is an American food company that manufactures, markets, and distributes spices, seasoning mixes, condiments, and other flavoring products to retail outlets, food manufacturers, and food service businesses.
LRHC vs MKC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.2M | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $226.6M |
| Gross Margin | 8.4% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | -24.7% | 16.8% |
| Net Margin | -27.4% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | 2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -125.7% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-5.44 | $0.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.1M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $226.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $225.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $175.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-95.7M | $162.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $215.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $223.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $184.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $166.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 37.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 38.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 37.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.7% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.0% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.4% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 337.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -546.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.84 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.44 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.25 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.86 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.54 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.49 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.49 | $0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.35 | $0.62 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.0M | $95.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $642.8K | $3.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6M | $5.7B |
| Total Assets | $21.7M | $13.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $94.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $124.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $102.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $186.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $200.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $166.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $178.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $642.8K | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.3K | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $645.9K | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.6K | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.2K | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.8K | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $652.4K | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-87.5M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $13.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0M | $12.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $13.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.7M | $13.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.3M | $12.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.12× | 0.79× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $542.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 2.39× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $542.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $258.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $115.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $458.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-591.6K | $161.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-803.1K | $163.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-538.3K | $138.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $206.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $78.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $102.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $94.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $76.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
MKC
| Consumer | $1.1B | 61% |
| Flavor Solutions | $723.1M | 39% |
