vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Stride, Inc. (LRN) and PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp (PRDO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Stride, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($631.3M vs $211.6M, roughly 3.0× PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp). On growth, PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.0% vs 7.5%). Stride, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($91.6M vs $37.9M). Over the past eight quarters, PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs 10.1%).

Stride, Inc. is a for-profit education company that provides online and blended education programs. Stride, Inc. is an education management organization (EMO) that provides online education designed as an alternative to traditional "brick and mortar" education for public school students from kindergarten to 12th grade, as well as career learning programs. As of 2012, publicly traded Stride, Inc. was the largest EMO in terms of enrollment.

Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is a public company that owns five for-profit universities in the United States: American Intercontinental University, Colorado Technical University, California Southern University, Trident University International, and University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences. The company was previously known as Career Education Corporation.

LRN vs PRDO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LRN
LRN
3.0× larger
LRN
$631.3M
$211.6M
PRDO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PRDO
PRDO
+12.5% gap
PRDO
20.0%
7.5%
LRN
More free cash flow
LRN
LRN
$53.7M more FCF
LRN
$91.6M
$37.9M
PRDO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PRDO
PRDO
Annualised
PRDO
12.2%
10.1%
LRN

Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025

Metric
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Revenue
$631.3M
$211.6M
Net Profit
$99.5M
Gross Margin
41.1%
Operating Margin
23.3%
19.8%
Net Margin
15.8%
Revenue YoY
7.5%
20.0%
Net Profit YoY
3.2%
EPS (diluted)
$2.12
$0.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
$631.3M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$620.9M
$211.9M
Q2 25
$653.6M
$209.6M
Q1 25
$613.4M
$213.0M
Q4 24
$587.2M
$176.4M
Q3 24
$551.1M
$169.8M
Q2 24
$534.2M
$166.7M
Q1 24
$520.8M
$168.3M
Net Profit
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
$99.5M
Q3 25
$68.8M
$39.9M
Q2 25
$51.3M
$41.0M
Q1 25
$99.3M
$43.7M
Q4 24
$96.4M
Q3 24
$40.9M
$38.3M
Q2 24
$62.8M
$38.4M
Q1 24
$69.7M
$39.4M
Gross Margin
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
41.1%
Q3 25
39.0%
Q2 25
36.6%
Q1 25
40.6%
Q4 24
40.8%
Q3 24
39.2%
Q2 24
35.2%
Q1 24
38.7%
Operating Margin
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
23.3%
19.8%
Q3 25
11.1%
24.1%
Q2 25
8.7%
24.5%
Q1 25
21.3%
24.3%
Q4 24
21.3%
21.1%
Q3 24
8.6%
26.4%
Q2 24
13.8%
27.6%
Q1 24
17.0%
27.5%
Net Margin
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
15.8%
Q3 25
11.1%
18.8%
Q2 25
7.9%
19.6%
Q1 25
16.2%
20.5%
Q4 24
16.4%
Q3 24
7.4%
22.5%
Q2 24
11.8%
23.0%
Q1 24
13.4%
23.4%
EPS (diluted)
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
$2.12
$0.55
Q3 25
$1.40
$0.60
Q2 25
$0.96
$0.62
Q1 25
$2.02
$0.65
Q4 24
$2.03
$0.46
Q3 24
$0.94
$0.57
Q2 24
$1.44
$0.57
Q1 24
$1.60
$0.59

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$625.7M
$111.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$417.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$972.4M
Total Assets
$2.3B
$1.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.27×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
$625.7M
$111.0M
Q3 25
$715.1M
$159.5M
Q2 25
$985.3M
$172.1M
Q1 25
$723.7M
$132.1M
Q4 24
$717.5M
$109.1M
Q3 24
$522.2M
$238.0M
Q2 24
$692.3M
$127.9M
Q1 24
$376.6M
$125.8M
Total Debt
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
$417.2M
Q3 25
$416.8M
Q2 25
$416.3M
Q1 25
$415.9M
Q4 24
$415.5M
Q3 24
$415.1M
Q2 24
$414.7M
Q1 24
$414.3M
Stockholders' Equity
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
$1.5B
$972.4M
Q3 25
$1.5B
$997.9M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$984.6M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$970.3M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$959.5M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$935.4M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$899.5M
Q1 24
$1.1B
$866.1M
Total Assets
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
$2.3B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$2.3B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$2.3B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$2.2B
$1.3B
Q4 24
$2.1B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$2.0B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.9B
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.9B
$1.1B
Debt / Equity
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
0.27×
Q3 25
0.27×
Q2 25
0.28×
Q1 25
0.29×
Q4 24
0.32×
Q3 24
0.34×
Q2 24
0.35×
Q1 24
0.38×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$91.8M
$40.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$91.6M
$37.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
14.5%
17.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
1.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.92×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$246.3M
$216.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
$91.8M
$40.1M
Q3 25
$-195.8M
$41.2M
Q2 25
$298.3M
$78.8M
Q1 25
$53.1M
$65.1M
Q4 24
$223.4M
$17.6M
Q3 24
$-142.0M
$51.0M
Q2 24
$172.2M
$38.5M
Q1 24
$68.6M
$54.5M
Free Cash Flow
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
$91.6M
$37.9M
Q3 25
$-196.1M
$39.4M
Q2 25
$297.9M
$76.0M
Q1 25
$52.9M
$63.4M
Q4 24
$222.9M
$16.0M
Q3 24
$-142.7M
$50.0M
Q2 24
$171.4M
$37.7M
Q1 24
$68.4M
$53.3M
FCF Margin
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
14.5%
17.9%
Q3 25
-31.6%
18.6%
Q2 25
45.6%
36.3%
Q1 25
8.6%
29.8%
Q4 24
38.0%
9.1%
Q3 24
-25.9%
29.4%
Q2 24
32.1%
22.6%
Q1 24
13.1%
31.7%
Capex Intensity
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
0.0%
1.1%
Q3 25
0.0%
0.9%
Q2 25
0.1%
1.3%
Q1 25
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 24
0.1%
0.9%
Q3 24
0.1%
0.6%
Q2 24
0.1%
0.5%
Q1 24
0.0%
0.7%
Cash Conversion
LRN
LRN
PRDO
PRDO
Q4 25
0.92×
Q3 25
-2.85×
1.03×
Q2 25
5.81×
1.92×
Q1 25
0.53×
1.49×
Q4 24
2.32×
Q3 24
-3.47×
1.33×
Q2 24
2.74×
1.00×
Q1 24
0.98×
1.38×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LRN
LRN

General Education$341.4M54%
Middle High School$275.6M44%
Adult$14.3M2%

PRDO
PRDO

CTU$107.0M51%
AIUS$60.8M29%
University Of St Augustine For Health Sciences Llc$43.7M21%
Other$1.1M1%

Related Comparisons