vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC (LSAK) and NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NMI Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($180.7M vs $178.7M, roughly 1.0× LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC). NMI Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 52.1% vs 2.0%, a 50.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NMI Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs 1.4%). NMI Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($412.5M vs $-14.8M). Over the past eight quarters, LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 7.5%).
Lesaka Technologies is a South-African financial technology company that is listed on the NASDAQ and Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Lesaka’s primary focus is on financial inclusion, offering financial services to previously underserved communities and merchants.
NMI Holdings, Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered private mortgage insurance provider. It offers mortgage guarantee insurance solutions to lending institutions to mitigate credit risks associated with residential home loans, primarily serving the U.S. domestic housing market, supporting accessible homeownership for qualified borrowers while shielding lenders from default-related losses.
LSAK vs NMIH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $178.7M | $180.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.6M | $94.2M |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.0% | 52.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 111.2% | 9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $1.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $178.7M | $180.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $171.4M | $178.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.5M | $173.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.4M | $173.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.2M | $166.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.6M | $166.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.0M | $162.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.2M | $156.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $94.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.4M | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.1M | $102.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.5M | $86.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $92.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.0M | $92.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $89.0M |
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.7% | 71.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 75.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 66.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.0% | 71.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 73.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 73.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 52.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.5% | 53.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.9% | 55.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 59.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.4% | 51.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 55.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 56.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.9% | 57.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $1.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.40 | $1.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.27 | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $1.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $69.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $216.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $180.6M | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $704.6M | $3.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $69.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $216.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $194.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $180.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.4M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $161.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $185.2M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.2M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $173.1M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $704.6M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $652.9M | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $653.7M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $649.2M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $558.5M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $551.5M | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.78× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.9M | $419.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.8M | $412.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.3% | 228.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.99× | 4.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-15.3M | $764.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-10.9M | $419.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.1M | $128.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7M | $101.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | $393.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.1M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7M | $117.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.2M | $111.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.8M | $412.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $126.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.2M | $126.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $99.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.5M | $386.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.1M | $126.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $937.0K | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2M | $109.4M |
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | 228.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | 72.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 57.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.8% | 232.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | 76.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | 70.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | -2.99× | 4.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSAK
| Telecom Products And Services | $82.0M | 46% |
| Processing Fees | $37.6M | 21% |
| Enterprise Segment | $14.5M | 8% |
| Rest Of Africa | $10.9M | 6% |
| Technology Products | $8.6M | 5% |
| Insurance Revenue | $7.9M | 4% |
| Lending Revenue | $7.2M | 4% |
| Other | $6.7M | 4% |
| Interest From Customer | $2.1M | 1% |
| Other Products And Services | $1.2M | 1% |
NMIH
Segment breakdown not available.
