vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC (LSAK) and OSHKOSH CORP (OSK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $2.3B, roughly 1.3× OSHKOSH CORP). OSHKOSH CORP runs the higher net margin — 1.9% vs 0.0%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OSHKOSH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs 0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (352.8% CAGR vs -9.8%).
Lesaka Technologies is a South-African financial technology company that is listed on the NASDAQ and Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Lesaka’s primary focus is on financial inclusion, offering financial services to previously underserved communities and merchants.
OSHKOSH CORPOSKEarnings & Financial Report
Oshkosh Corporation, formerly Oshkosh Truck, is an American industrial company that designs and builds specialty trucks, military vehicles, truck bodies, airport fire apparatus, and access equipment. The corporation also owns Pierce Manufacturing, a fire apparatus manufacturer in Appleton, Wisconsin, and JLG Industries, a manufacturer of lift equipment, including aerial lifts, boom lifts, scissor lifts, telehandlers and low-level access lifts.
LSAK vs OSK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.0B | $2.3B |
| Net Profit | $437.0K | $43.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 13.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 3.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.0% | 1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -61.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $178.7M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $171.4M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.5M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.2M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.6M | $2.7B |
| Q3 26 | $437.0K | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $133.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | $196.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.4M | $204.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.1M | $112.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.5M | $153.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $180.3M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 18.5% |
| Q3 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.0% | 9.7% |
| Q3 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 6.6% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $0.68 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.40 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | $250.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $600.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $11.5B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $250.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.5M | $479.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.2M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.5M | $191.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.0M | $210.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.6M | $204.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.7M | $160.9M |
| Q3 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $600.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $216.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $194.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.5M | $602.3M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $180.6M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.4M | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $161.6M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $185.2M | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.3M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.2M | $4.1B |
| Q3 26 | $11.5B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $10.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $704.6M | $10.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $652.9M | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $653.7M | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $649.2M | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.6M | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.9M | $9.9B |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.81× | 0.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
