vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC (LSAK) and Primo Brands Corp (PRMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.8× Primo Brands Corp). Primo Brands Corp runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs 0.0%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Primo Brands Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.8% vs 0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (341.6% CAGR vs 19.7%).
Lesaka Technologies is a South-African financial technology company that is listed on the NASDAQ and Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Lesaka’s primary focus is on financial inclusion, offering financial services to previously underserved communities and merchants.
Primo Brands Corporation is an American-Canadian water company offering multi-gallon bottled water, water dispensers, self-service refill water machines, and water filtration appliances. The company is headquartered in Tampa, Florida, and services residential and commercial customers across the United States, Canada, Europe and Israel.
LSAK vs PRMB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.0B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $437.0K | $27.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.0% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | 0.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -4.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $178.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $171.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.2M | — |
| Q3 26 | $437.0K | — | ||
| Q2 26 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.4M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.1M | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.5M | — |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | 27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.5% | 32.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.7% | — |
| Q3 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 26 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q3 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.4% | — |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.40 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.27 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $5.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | $11.5B | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.5M | $376.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.6M | — |
| Q3 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $216.8M | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.1M | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.8M | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $194.7M | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.7M | — |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $180.6M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $161.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $185.2M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.3M | — |
| Q3 26 | $11.5B | — | ||
| Q2 26 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $704.6M | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $652.9M | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $653.7M | $11.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $649.2M | $11.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.6M | — |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.20× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.24× | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 1.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.77× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $103.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-10.9M | $203.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $283.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.1M | $155.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7M | $38.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | — |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.8M | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $167.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.2M | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.5M | — |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.8% | — |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 3.80× | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSAK
Segment breakdown not available.
PRMB
| Regional spring water | $801.2M | 49% |
| Purified water | $511.2M | 31% |
| Other | $208.2M | 13% |
| Premium water | $105.5M | 6% |
