vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP (LSCC) and REPLIGEN CORP (RGEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
REPLIGEN CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.9M vs $145.8M, roughly 1.4× LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP). REPLIGEN CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.7% vs -5.2%, a 12.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, REPLIGEN CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.6% vs 9.3%). LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($44.0M vs $17.6M). Over the past eight quarters, REPLIGEN CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.4% CAGR vs 8.4%).
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation is an American semiconductor company specializing in the design and manufacturing of low power field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Headquartered in the Silicon Forest area of Hillsboro, Oregon, the company also has operations in San Jose, Calif., Shanghai, Manila, Penang, and Singapore. Lattice Semiconductor has more than 1000 employees and an annual revenue of more than $660 million as of 2022. The company was founded in 1983 and went public in 1989. It ...
Repligen Corporation is a global life sciences company devoted to the development and commercialization of innovative bioprocessing technologies and systems that enable efficiencies in the process of manufacturing biological drugs.2025 The company is based in Waltham, Massachusetts,2014 and was incorporated in Delaware in 1981. A public company, Repligen is listed on the NASDAQ exchange under the symbol RGEN. As of 2025, Repligen employs over 1,900 employees globally and serves primarily biop...
LSCC vs RGEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $145.8M | $197.9M |
| Net Profit | $-7.6M | $13.3M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | 52.5% |
| Operating Margin | 30.7% | 9.0% |
| Net Margin | -5.2% | 6.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 13.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.6% | 143.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $145.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $197.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.3M | $188.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.0M | $182.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.2M | $169.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.4M | $174.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.1M | $154.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.1M | $154.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | $-30.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $-654.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6M | $3.3M |
| Q1 26 | 68.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 52.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.9% | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.4% | 50.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.0% | 53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.1% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.0% | 50.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 68.3% | 49.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.4% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | -17.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.12 | $-0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $133.9M | $767.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $542.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $714.1M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | — | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.26× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $133.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $767.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.9M | $748.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.2M | $708.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.6M | $697.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.3M | $757.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.3M | $784.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.2M | $809.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $542.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $537.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $525.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $714.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $687.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $707.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $710.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $703.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $698.8M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $883.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $844.4M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $808.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $823.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $843.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $853.7M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.5M | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $57.6M | $25.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $44.0M | $17.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 30.2% | 8.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $153.3M | $93.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $57.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $25.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.1M | $48.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.5M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | $39.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.9M | $42.2M |
| Q1 26 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.3M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.7M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.4M | $42.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $37.4M |
| Q1 26 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.5% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 24.3% |
| Q1 26 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.86× | 3.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.23× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.35× | 2.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.97× | 12.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
