vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR) and Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. (OLLI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $613.6M, roughly 1.9× Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc.). Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs 3.4%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.6% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC's revenue compounded faster (-2.2% CAGR vs -2.8%).
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
Ollie's Bargain Outlet is an American discount store chain. It was founded in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, in 1982 by Morton Bernstein, Mark Butler, Harry Coverman, and Oliver "Ollie" Rosenberg, the company's namesake. As of September 2025, the chain has 618 locations in 34 states. Its selection of merchandise comprises a variety of discounted items, mostly overstock or closeout merchandise that is purchased in bulk from other retailers and sold at discounted prices. Ollie's Bargain Outlet st...
LSTR vs OLLI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $613.6M |
| Net Profit | $39.4M | $46.2M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 9.0% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 18.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.3% | 28.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $613.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $679.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $576.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $667.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $578.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $508.8M |
| Q1 26 | $39.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | $46.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.8M | $68.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.2M | $35.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $46.3M |
| Q1 26 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.1% |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.56 | $0.99 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $1.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.30 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.41 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $411.0M | $144.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $26.1M | $1.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $799.0M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.2M | $144.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $434.4M | $231.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.2M | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.4M | $205.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $566.6M | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.3M | $170.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | $212.3M |
| Q1 26 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $912.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $925.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $984.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $1.1M |
| Q1 26 | $799.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $795.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $930.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $972.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $4.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-26.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -4.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $153.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.7M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.3M | $80.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.7M | $147.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.1M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.1M | $43.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.1M | $40.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.5M | $-26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.0M | $54.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.8M | $123.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.4M | $-35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.6M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | $13.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 18.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.04× | 0.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.61× | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.87× | 2.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.32× | -0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.66× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.91× | 0.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
