vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR) and SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO (SMG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC). SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs 3.4%, a 13.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs -16.9%). Over the past eight quarters, SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs -2.2%).
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Marysville, Ohio, where O.M. Scott began selling lawn seed in 1868. The company manufactures and sells consumer lawn, garden and pest control products, as well as soilless indoor gardening equipment. In the U.S., the company manufactures Scotts, Miracle-Gro and Ortho brands. It also markets and distributes the herbicide Roundup in the U.S. and several international markets including China.
LSTR vs SMG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $39.4M | $238.6M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 27.5% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 16.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | -16.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.3% | 61.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $-2.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $354.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $387.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $416.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $414.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $39.4M | $238.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | $-125.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.8M | $217.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.2M | $-69.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $132.1M |
| Q1 26 | 9.6% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.5% |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | -6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | -38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | -12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | -52.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 16.6% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | -35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | -16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | $-2.00 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $-2.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.56 | $-2.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $3.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.30 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.41 | $-4.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $2.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $411.0M | $6.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $26.1M | $2.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $799.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $411.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.2M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $434.4M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.2M | $51.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.4M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $566.6M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.3M | $71.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | $279.9M |
| Q1 26 | $26.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — |
| Q1 26 | $799.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $795.7M | $-500.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $-357.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.8M | $-170.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $930.8M | $-290.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $972.4M | $-479.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $-390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $-146.2M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
