vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LIGHTBRIDGE Corp (LTBR) and LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. (LXU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lightbridge Corp is a specialized nuclear energy technology company focused on developing innovative metallic nuclear fuel designs. It delivers solutions that improve reactor safety, increase power generation efficiency, and reduce operational costs for commercial nuclear power plant operators and government nuclear energy stakeholders across global markets.
Eldridge Industries, LLC is an American holding company headquartered in Miami, with offices in New York City, Greenwich, Connecticut, London, and Beverly Hills. It invests in industries such as insurance, asset management, technology, sports, media, real estate, and the consumer sector.
LTBR vs LXU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $165.0M |
| Net Profit | $-4.8M | $16.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.2% |
| Net Margin | — | 9.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 22.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -69.2% | 276.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.24 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $165.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $143.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $134.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $109.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $140.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | $138.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.7M | $-25.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.8M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -23.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.24 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.21 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $148.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $440.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $57.3M | $520.0M |
| Total Assets | $58.3M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $148.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $124.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $163.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $184.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $216.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $265.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $440.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $447.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $446.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $478.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $476.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $476.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $479.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $543.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $520.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $504.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $495.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.3M | $490.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.5M | $491.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $499.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0M | $522.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.0M | $518.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.9M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.3M | $17.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 12.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $18.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $17.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $41.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-315.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-24.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LTBR
Segment breakdown not available.
LXU
| Ammonium Nitrate And Nitric Acid | $64.7M | 39% |
| Ammonia | $49.4M | 30% |
| Urea Ammonium Nitrate UAN | $43.5M | 26% |
| Other | $7.4M | 4% |
