vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A. (LTM) and Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trip.com Group Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($304.6M vs $25, roughly 12182640.0× LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A.). LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A. runs the higher net margin — 484228.0% vs 27.8%, a 484200.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
LATAM Airlines Group S.A. is a Chilean multinational airline holding company headquartered in Santiago, Chile. It is the largest airline company in Latin America with subsidiaries in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay and Peru. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States on 26 May 2020, due to economic problems attributed to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on aviation.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
LTM vs TCOM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2023 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25 | $304.6M |
| Net Profit | $121.1K | $84.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 484228.0% | 27.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $29.00 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $304.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $242.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $214.5M | ||
| Q1 23 | $25 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $82.7M | ||
| Q1 22 | $25 | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 23 | $121.1K | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $152.6M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 76.0% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 26.4% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 23 | 484228.0% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 184.6% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 23 | $29.00 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 22 | $29.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $10.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $23.8B |
| Total Assets | — | $36.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $23.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.1B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $16.3B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $16.3B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $15.2B | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $36.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $30.1B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $27.8B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $26.9B | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LTM
Segment breakdown not available.
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
