vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (LVLU) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.1M vs $66.1M, roughly 1.3× Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc.). PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp runs the higher net margin — -38.1% vs -48.2%, a 10.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -11.8%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs -14.7%).
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. is a direct-to-consumer women's fashion retailer offering affordable, trendy apparel, footwear, and accessories. It primarily serves Gen Z and millennial consumers across North America, operating mainly via its e-commerce platform, with limited pop-up physical locations to boost customer engagement.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
LVLU vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $66.1M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | $-31.9M | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -52.8% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | -48.2% | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.8% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -340.9% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.46 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.1M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.5M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.9M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.9M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.5% | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.8% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.2% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.46 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.47 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.92 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.5M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4M | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $108.2M | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.2M | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.5M | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.3M | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.5M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7M | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.3% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 2.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LVLU
| Single Reportable Segment | $63.0M | 95% |
| Other | $2.4M | 4% |
| Stored Value Cards | $750.0K | 1% |
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
