vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LUXFER HOLDINGS PLC (LXFR) and MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC (MTX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($519.5M vs $90.7M, roughly 5.7× LUXFER HOLDINGS PLC). MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 7.2% vs -3.4%, a 10.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.3% vs -12.3%). MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.9M vs $12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, LUXFER HOLDINGS PLC's revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Luxfer Holdings PLC is a global industrial manufacturer specializing in high-performance engineering materials and components. Its core products include lightweight aluminum and composite gas containment systems, advanced alloys, and specialty materials, serving key sectors such as aerospace, healthcare, automotive, industrial manufacturing, and alternative energy worldwide.
Compass Minerals International, Inc is an American public company that, through its subsidiaries, is a leading producer of minerals, including salt, magnesium chloride and sulfate of potash. Based in Overland Park, Kansas; the company provides bulk treated and untreated highway deicing salt to customers in North America and the United Kingdom and plant nutrition products to growers worldwide. Compass Minerals also produces consumer deicing and water conditioning products, consumer and commerc...
LXFR vs MTX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $90.7M | $519.5M |
| Net Profit | $-3.1M | $37.2M |
| Gross Margin | 24.4% | 24.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 11.9% |
| Net Margin | -3.4% | 7.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.3% | 0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -188.6% | -31.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $1.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $90.7M | $519.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.9M | $532.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | $528.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.0M | $491.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.4M | $518.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.4M | $524.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.7M | $541.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.4M | $534.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.1M | $37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $45.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $-144.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $46.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-500.0K | $19.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $46.7M |
| Q4 25 | 24.4% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.5% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.6% | 25.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -32.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | 14.1% |
| Q4 25 | -3.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -29.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $1.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $1.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | $-4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | $1.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.47 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $0.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $1.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3M | $332.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $39.4M | $961.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $226.4M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $369.7M | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | 0.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $332.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0M | $328.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $319.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1M | $312.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $337.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5M | $324.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $316.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8M | $320.1M |
| Q4 25 | $39.4M | $961.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.3M | $964.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $965.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | $966.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.1M | $966.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $922.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.2M | $922.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.4M | $925.8M |
| Q4 25 | $226.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $226.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $219.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.3M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $369.7M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.4M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.2M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.2M | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $382.4M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $404.8M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $379.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $386.0M | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.22× | 0.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.20× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | 0.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.31× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | 0.55× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.37× | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.6M | $64.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $12.4M | $31.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.7% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | 6.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $26.2M | $86.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $64.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8M | $70.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $62.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.5M | $70.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.0M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $55.9M |
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-700.0K | $33.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.5M | $42.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $29.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $39.4M |
| Q4 25 | 13.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | -4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.37× | 1.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.29× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.02× | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.37× | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LXFR
| Gas Cylinders Segment | $43.8M | 48% |
| Defense First Response And Healthcare | $18.6M | 21% |
| Rest Of Europe | $9.0M | 10% |
| DE | $7.0M | 8% |
| Asia Pacific | $5.8M | 6% |
| CA | $4.0M | 4% |
| Other | $2.5M | 3% |
MTX
| High Temperature Technologies | $178.0M | 34% |
| Specialty Additives | $141.8M | 27% |
| Household And Personal Care | $132.5M | 26% |
| Environmental And Infrastructure | $67.2M | 13% |
