vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LSI INDUSTRIES INC (LYTS) and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($212.2M vs $143.9M, roughly 1.5× LSI INDUSTRIES INC). LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.8% vs 1.4%, a 17.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.6% vs -4.4%). Over the past eight quarters, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs 2.1%).

LSI Logic Corporation was an American ASIC and EDA company founded in Santa Clara, California. The company designed and sold semiconductors and software that accelerated storage and networking in data centers, mobile networks and client computing.

LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., is an American SaaS company that offers a data connectivity platform whose services include data onboarding, the transfer of offline data online for marketing purposes.

LYTS vs RAMP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RAMP
RAMP
1.5× larger
RAMP
$212.2M
$143.9M
LYTS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RAMP
RAMP
+13.0% gap
RAMP
8.6%
-4.4%
LYTS
Higher net margin
RAMP
RAMP
17.4% more per $
RAMP
18.8%
1.4%
LYTS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RAMP
RAMP
Annualised
RAMP
11.1%
2.1%
LYTS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Revenue
$143.9M
$212.2M
Net Profit
$2.0M
$39.9M
Gross Margin
71.9%
Operating Margin
18.6%
Net Margin
1.4%
18.8%
Revenue YoY
-4.4%
8.6%
Net Profit YoY
-4.8%
255.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.62

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
$143.9M
Q1 26
$143.9M
Q4 25
$147.0M
$212.2M
Q3 25
$157.2M
$199.8M
Q2 25
$155.1M
$194.8M
Q1 25
$132.5M
$188.7M
Q4 24
$147.7M
$195.4M
Q3 24
$138.1M
$185.5M
Net Profit
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
$2.0M
Q1 26
$2.0M
Q4 25
$6.3M
$39.9M
Q3 25
$7.3M
$27.4M
Q2 25
$8.2M
$7.7M
Q1 25
$3.9M
$-6.3M
Q4 24
$5.6M
$11.2M
Q3 24
$6.7M
$1.7M
Gross Margin
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
25.5%
71.9%
Q3 25
25.6%
70.2%
Q2 25
26.1%
70.1%
Q1 25
24.8%
69.3%
Q4 24
23.6%
71.9%
Q3 24
24.4%
72.4%
Operating Margin
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.0%
18.6%
Q3 25
7.0%
10.7%
Q2 25
7.7%
3.7%
Q1 25
4.7%
-6.1%
Q4 24
5.7%
7.5%
Q3 24
6.6%
4.0%
Net Margin
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
1.4%
Q1 26
1.4%
Q4 25
4.3%
18.8%
Q3 25
4.6%
13.7%
Q2 25
5.3%
4.0%
Q1 25
2.9%
-3.3%
Q4 24
3.8%
5.7%
Q3 24
4.8%
0.9%
EPS (diluted)
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.20
$0.62
Q3 25
$0.23
$0.42
Q2 25
$0.26
$0.12
Q1 25
$0.13
$-0.10
Q4 24
$0.18
$0.17
Q3 24
$0.22
$0.03

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$403.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$261.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$352.8M
$962.3M
Total Assets
$800.5M
$1.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
$6.4M
$403.4M
Q3 25
$7.1M
$376.9M
Q2 25
$3.5M
$371.1M
Q1 25
$4.3M
$420.8M
Q4 24
$4.7M
$384.3M
Q3 24
$7.0M
$348.4M
Total Debt
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
$261.0M
Q1 26
$261.0M
Q4 25
$27.9M
Q3 25
$50.7M
Q2 25
$48.6M
Q1 25
$55.4M
Q4 24
$38.2M
Q3 24
$47.7M
Stockholders' Equity
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
$352.8M
Q1 26
$352.8M
Q4 25
$248.1M
$962.3M
Q3 25
$241.3M
$943.8M
Q2 25
$230.7M
$947.8M
Q1 25
$221.7M
$948.9M
Q4 24
$217.1M
$957.7M
Q3 24
$211.2M
$932.1M
Total Assets
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
$800.5M
Q1 26
$800.5M
Q4 25
$396.3M
$1.3B
Q3 25
$404.9M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$396.4M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$384.6M
$1.3B
Q4 24
$344.5M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$349.5M
$1.2B
Debt / Equity
LYTS
LYTS
RAMP
RAMP
Q3 26
0.74×
Q1 26
0.74×
Q4 25
0.11×
Q3 25
0.21×
Q2 25
0.21×
Q1 25
0.25×
Q4 24
0.18×
Q3 24
0.23×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons