vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LA-Z-BOY INC (LZB) and VNET Group, Inc. (VNET). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LA-Z-BOY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($541.6M vs $362.7M, roughly 1.5× VNET Group, Inc.). LA-Z-BOY INC runs the higher net margin — 4.0% vs -10.7%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. LA-Z-BOY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($71.6M vs $-193.1M). Over the past eight quarters, VNET Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.4% CAGR vs -1.1%).
La-Z-Boy Inc. is an American furniture manufacturer based in Monroe, Michigan, United States, that makes home furniture, including upholstered recliners, sofas, stationary chairs, lift chairs and sleeper sofas. The company employs more than 11,000 people.
VNET Group, Inc. is a leading neutral internet data center service provider operating primarily in China. It offers cloud computing infrastructure, colocation services, managed network solutions, and hybrid cloud support to enterprise clients across technology, finance, and retail sectors, enabling stable, high-performance digital operation foundations for domestic and global businesses expanding in the Chinese market.
LZB vs VNET — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $541.6M | $362.7M |
| Net Profit | $21.6M | $-38.7M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 0.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.0% | -10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.52 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $541.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $522.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $492.2M | $362.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $570.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $521.8M | $309.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $521.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.5M | $302.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $553.5M | $274.4M |
| Q1 26 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $-38.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.4M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.3M | $-1.1M |
| Q1 26 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.3% | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.1% | 23.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | 21.3% |
| Q1 26 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | -10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | -0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | -0.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.71 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.61 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.91 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $306.1M | $492.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $890.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $6.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $306.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $338.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $318.5M | $492.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $328.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $314.6M | $544.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.3M | $219.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $341.1M | $247.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $890.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $927.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $999.2M | $902.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $900.6M |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $89.4M | $113.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $71.6M | $-193.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | -53.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 84.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $158.2M | $-589.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $89.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3M | $113.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0M | $27.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.3M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.8M | $55.8M |
| Q1 26 | $71.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.8M | $-193.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | $-220.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.7M | $-95.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.3M | $-81.6M |
| Q1 26 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | -53.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | -71.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | -31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | -29.8% |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 84.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 79.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 67.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 50.1% |
| Q1 26 | 4.13× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LZB
| Stationary Upholstery Furniture | $286.2M | 53% |
| Retail Segment | $251.9M | 47% |
VNET
Segment breakdown not available.
