vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mid-America Apartment Communities (MAA) and UDR, Inc. (UDR), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mid-America Apartment Communities is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($555.6M vs $4.3M, roughly 129.8× UDR, Inc.). UDR, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.4% vs 5206.8%, a 5196.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UDR, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.1% vs 1.0%). UDR, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($192.1M vs $158.6M). Over the past eight quarters, UDR, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (47.6% CAGR vs 1.1%).
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA) is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Memphis, Tennessee that invests in apartments in the Southeastern United States and the Southwestern United States.
UDR may refer to:Ulster Defence Regiment, a former British Army infantry regiment Universal dielectric response, An emergent scaling behaviour in heterogeneous materials under alternating current União Democrática Ruralista, a Brazilian right-wing association of farmers Union of Democrats for the Republic, a former political party in France Union of the Right for the Republic, a present political party in France Union for Democracy and the Republic (Chad), a political party in Chad Democratic Un...
MAA vs UDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $555.6M | $4.3M |
| Net Profit | $57.6M | $222.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.4% | 5206.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.0% | 87.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -65.5% | 4519.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.48 | $0.67 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $555.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $554.4M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $549.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $549.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $549.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $546.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $543.6M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $57.6M | $222.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.5M | $40.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.1M | $37.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $181.7M | $76.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.6M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $102.0M | $28.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.7M | $43.1M |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 5206.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 1572.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.7% | 1571.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.1% | 3632.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.3% | -220.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | 1090.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.7% | 1449.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.4% | 2195.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.84 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.92 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.54 | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.43 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.98 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.86 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.22 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $60.3M | $1.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.7B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $12.0B | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.77× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $60.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.5M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.6M | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $12.0B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8B | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6B | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $11.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $261.7M | $261.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $158.6M | $192.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.5% | 4487.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 18.6% | 1618.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 4.55× | 1.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $717.9M | $650.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $261.7M | $261.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.4M | $234.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.4M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.6M | $156.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.1M | $240.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $309.5M | $230.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $349.4M | $238.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $200.3M | $167.6M |
| Q4 25 | $158.6M | $192.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.8M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.5M | $190.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.0M | $103.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.6M | $179.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $215.5M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $259.7M | $171.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $148.2M | $115.0M |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | 4487.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.8% | 6405.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.1% | 7926.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.6% | 4887.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.8% | 7842.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.1% | 7787.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.5% | 8591.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.3% | 5854.2% |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 1618.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | 2736.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | 2512.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.2% | 2509.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 2670.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | 3325.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | 3379.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | 2675.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.55× | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.68× | 5.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.27× | 6.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.08× | 2.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.69× | 10.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.43× | 8.26× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.39× | 3.88× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MAA
| Same Store | $515.5M | 93% |
| Non Same Store And Other | $36.8M | 7% |
UDR
Segment breakdown not available.
