vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MACERICH CO (MAC) and Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MACERICH CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($261.7M vs $132.2M, roughly 2.0× Nine Energy Service, Inc.). MACERICH CO runs the higher net margin — -7.2% vs -14.5%, a 7.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MACERICH CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.4% vs -6.5%). Over the past eight quarters, MACERICH CO's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs -3.6%).
The Macerich Company is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers. It is the third-largest owner and operator of shopping centers in the United States. As of December 31, 2024, the company owned interests in 43 properties comprising 43 million square feet of leasable area. The company name is a portmanteau of its founders, Mace Siegel and Richard Cohen.
Xcel Energy Inc. is a U.S. regulated electric utility and natural gas delivery company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, serving approximately 3.9 million electricity customers and 2.2 million natural gas customers across parts of eight states as of mid-2025. It consists of four operating subsidiaries: Northern States Power-Minnesota, Northern States Power-Wisconsin, Public Service Company of Colorado, and Southwestern Public Service Co.
MAC vs NINE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $261.7M | $132.2M |
| Net Profit | $-18.8M | $-19.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -4.2% |
| Net Margin | -7.2% | -14.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.4% | -6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 91.1% | -117.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $-0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $261.7M | $132.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.3M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.8M | $147.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $249.2M | $150.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $273.7M | $141.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.2M | $138.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.5M | $132.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $208.8M | $142.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.8M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-87.4M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.9M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.1M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-211.2M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-108.2M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-126.7M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | -7.2% | -14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -34.5% | -11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.4% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.1% | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -77.2% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -49.1% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 116.9% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -60.7% | -5.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.34 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.95 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.50 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.16 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.59 | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $280.2M | $18.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $-115.0M |
| Total Assets | $8.4B | $339.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $280.2M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $290.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.1M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.2M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.9M | $27.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.5M | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $120.1M | $10.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $-115.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $-95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $-81.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $-72.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $-66.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $-57.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $-49.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $-43.3M |
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | $339.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $340.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7B | $361.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7B | $359.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6B | $360.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6B | $353.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $381.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4B | $380.4M |
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.79× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.2M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -3.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-23.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.4M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.5M | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.5M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.4M | $12.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.1M | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-14.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MAC
Segment breakdown not available.
NINE
| Cement | $52.6M | 40% |
| Tool Revenue | $28.6M | 22% |
| Coiled Tubing | $25.8M | 20% |
| Wireline | $25.1M | 19% |
