vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) and NACCO INDUSTRIES INC (NC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NACCO INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($66.8M vs $47.3M, roughly 1.4× Mama's Creations, Inc.). Mama's Creations, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.1% vs -5.8%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mama's Creations, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (50.0% vs -5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Mama's Creations, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.0% CAGR vs 11.9%).
Mama's Creations, Inc. is a U.S.-based food manufacturing enterprise that produces a wide portfolio of refrigerated ready-to-eat and heat-and-serve food products, including Italian-style meatballs, sausages, pasta dishes, and other prepared meals. It mainly distributes its offerings to grocery retailers, mass merchandisers and foodservice partners across the United States, focusing on convenient, high-quality comfort food for daily consumer demand.
NACCO Industries, Inc. is an American publicly traded holding company, headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio. Through a portfolio of mining and natural resources businesses, the company operates under three business segments: Coal Mining, North American Mining, and Minerals Management. The Coal Mining segment operates surface coal mines under long-term contracts with power generation companies and an activated carbon producer pursuant to a service-based business model. The North American Mining se...
MAMA vs NC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.3M | $66.8M |
| Net Profit | $540.0K | $-3.8M |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 11.3% |
| Net Margin | 1.1% | -5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 50.0% | -5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 31.7% | -150.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | $66.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.2M | $76.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.3M | $68.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.6M | $65.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.5M | $70.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $61.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8M | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.7M | $53.3M |
| Q4 25 | $540.0K | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.0K | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $553.0K | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 23.6% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.3% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | -5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $1.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $2.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $0.61 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.1M | $49.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $100.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $49.6M | $429.2M |
| Total Assets | $84.0M | $661.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $52.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $49.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $61.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $72.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $63.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.0M | $62.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | $61.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $100.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $99.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.4M |
| Q4 25 | $49.6M | $429.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6M | $426.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.4M | $413.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.9M | $409.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.0M | $404.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $397.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $384.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.6M | $381.6M |
| Q4 25 | $84.0M | $661.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $637.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.7M | $631.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.1M | $634.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | $631.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.0M | $597.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2M | $560.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.1M | $538.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.9M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.16× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $42.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-857.0K | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-930.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.31× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.85× | -2.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.54× | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.71× | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.10× | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.58× | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.79× | -2.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MAMA
Segment breakdown not available.
NC
| Transferred Over Time | $42.7M | 64% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $24.1M | 36% |
