vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES INC (MANH) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($282.2M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.1× PicoCELA Inc.). MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES INC runs the higher net margin — 17.5% vs -125.2%, a 142.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Computer Associates International, Inc., later CA, Inc., and CA Technologies, Inc., was an American multinational enterprise software developer and publisher that existed from 1976 to 2018. CA grew to rank as one of the largest independent software corporations in the world, and at one point was the second largest. The company created systems software that ran in IBM mainframe, distributed computing, virtual machine, and cloud computing environments.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
MANH vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $282.2M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $49.3M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.5% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.82 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $282.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $272.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $262.8M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $255.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.6M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.85 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $226.1M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $205.2M | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $740.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $226.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $328.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.9M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $266.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $215.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $205.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $314.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $309.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $278.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $245.1M | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $740.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $839.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $768.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $744.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $708.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $757.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $698.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $665.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $84.0M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.70× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $84.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $147.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.3M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.4M | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.3% | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.39× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MANH
| Services | $125.7M | 45% |
| Cloud subscriptions | $117.1M | 42% |
| Maintenance | $30.6M | 11% |
| Hardware | $6.5M | 2% |
| Software license | $2.2M | 1% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
