vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vroom, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($235.9M vs $202.3M, roughly 1.2× MARA Holdings, Inc.). Vroom, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -59.8% vs -14298.3%, a 14238.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vroom, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs -5.6%). Vroom, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-108.8M vs $-1.2B). Over the past eight quarters, MARA Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs -49.5%).
MARA Holdings, Inc. is an American digital asset technology and cryptocurrency mining company headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Founded in 2010, the company initially operated as a patent holding company before pivoting in the late 2010s to focus on blockchain infrastructure and digital assets.
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
MARA vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $202.3M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7B | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | -11795.9% | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | -14298.3% | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.6% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -423.5% | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.25 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $202.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $238.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $214.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $165.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $808.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-533.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $528.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-124.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-199.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $337.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2613.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1065.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -587.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -289.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -11795.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -253.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -130.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -160.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -14298.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 338.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -249.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5367.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -94.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -137.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 204.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.25 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.84 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.55 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.60 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.42 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.72 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.26 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $547.1M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.6B | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $7.3B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.04× | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $547.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $826.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $324.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $618.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-802.7M | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2B | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -598.0% | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 201.2% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-2.0B | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-802.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-199.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-163.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-677.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-160.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-115.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-88.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-283.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-282.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-254.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-927.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-198.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-132.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-97.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | -598.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -112.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -118.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -118.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -432.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -150.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -91.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -59.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 201.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 117.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
