vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Masco (MAS) and Trane Technologies (TT), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trane Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.1B vs $1.8B, roughly 2.9× Masco). Trane Technologies runs the higher net margin — 9.2% vs 11.5%, a 2.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Trane Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.5% vs -1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Trane Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Masco Corporation is an American manufacturer of products for the home improvement and new home construction markets. Comprising more than 20 companies, the Masco conglomerate operates nearly 60 manufacturing facilities in the United States and over 20 in other parts of the world. Since 1969 it trades on the NYSE. Under the leadership of Richard Manoogian, the company grew exponentially and subsequently joined the Fortune 500 list of largest U.S. corporations.
Trane Technologies plc is an Irish domiciled company focused on heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration systems. The company traces its corporate history back more than 150 years and was created after a series of mergers and spin-offs. In 2008, HVAC manufacturer Trane was acquired by Ingersoll Rand, a US industrial tools manufacturer. In 2020, the tools business was spun off as Ingersoll Rand and the remaining company was renamed Trane Technologies.
MAS vs TT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $5.1B |
| Net Profit | $165.0M | $591.3M |
| Gross Margin | 33.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | 15.9% |
| Net Margin | 9.2% | 11.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.9% | 5.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.3% | -2.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.81 | $2.64 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | $165.0M | $591.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.0M | $847.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.0M | $874.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.0M | $604.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.0M | $604.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $167.0M | $772.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $258.0M | $755.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.0M | $436.3M |
| Q4 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.2% | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.6% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.8% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | 36.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.5% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.6% | 34.6% |
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.5% | 15.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.81 | $2.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | $3.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.28 | $3.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.87 | $2.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.85 | $2.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.77 | $3.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.17 | $3.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.97 | $1.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $647.0M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.9B | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-185.0M | $8.6B |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $21.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $647.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $559.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $390.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $634.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $646.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $368.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-185.0M | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-78.0M | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-84.0M | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-254.0M | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-279.0M | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-88.0M | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-75.0M | $6.9B |
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $21.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $21.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $21.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | $20.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $20.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $20.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $20.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $19.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $418.0M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $371.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 2.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 2.53× | 1.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $866.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $418.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $456.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $306.0M | $692.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-158.0M | $339.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $407.0M | $899.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $416.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.0M | $695.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-94.0M | $247.2M |
| Q4 25 | $371.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $415.0M | $935.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.0M | $602.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-190.0M | $220.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $774.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $378.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.0M | $623.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-125.0M | $163.4M |
| Q4 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.5% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.53× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.13× | 0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.85× | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.24× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.49× | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | 0.92× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.44× | 0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MAS
| Plumbing Products | $844.0M | 47% |
| Decorative Architectural Products | $545.0M | 30% |
| Other | $404.0M | 23% |
TT
Segment breakdown not available.
