vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd (MATH) and MOGU Inc. (MOGU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MOGU Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.5M vs $12.0M, roughly 1.6× Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd). Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — -24.0% vs -44.3%, a 20.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MOGU Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-12.4% vs -39.0%).
Metalpha Technology Holding LtdMATHEarnings & Financial Report
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd is a global fintech firm specializing in digital asset wealth management, institutional-grade crypto investment services, and Web3 ecosystem infrastructure support. It serves professional investors, financial institutions, and high-net-worth clients across Asia, North America and Europe, with core segments including structured digital asset products, risk management solutions and DeFi technology development.
Mogu Mogu is a brand of fruit-flavoured drink with pieces of nata de coco, produced by Thailand-based Sappe Public Company Limited and exported to many international markets, especially South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and France.
MATH vs MOGU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.0M | $19.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $-8.6M |
| Gross Margin | 28.3% | 0.0% |
| Operating Margin | -24.2% | -71.6% |
| Net Margin | -24.0% | -44.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -39.0% | -12.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -147.7% | -5.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.2M |
| Q3 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.2M |
| Q3 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 85.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q3 25 | -24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.3% | -71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -49.4% |
| Q3 25 | -24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | -44.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -37.0% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.1M | $52.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $101.2K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $35.1M | $70.1M |
| Total Assets | $413.8M | $118.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $52.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $58.2M |
| Q3 25 | $101.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $188.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.1K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $35.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.6M | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $81.5M |
| Q3 25 | $413.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $246.8M | $118.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $130.0M |
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.3M | $-9.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-10.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -55.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-18.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -84.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 58.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.66× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
