vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd (MATH) and Marti Technologies, Inc. (MRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Marti Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $12.0M, roughly 1.2× Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd). On growth, Marti Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (63.1% vs -39.0%).

Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd is a global fintech firm specializing in digital asset wealth management, institutional-grade crypto investment services, and Web3 ecosystem infrastructure support. It serves professional investors, financial institutions, and high-net-worth clients across Asia, North America and Europe, with core segments including structured digital asset products, risk management solutions and DeFi technology development.

The Marti Group is a Swiss construction company, consisting of over 80 subsidiaries, officially owned by Marti Holding AG. Besides Switzerland, they are active in neighboring countries such as Germany and Austria, and also outside of Europe such as China and Chile. The company is known for high-profile public and private sector projects and using innovative technologies. Their areas of expertise include building construction, construction and renovation of tunnels, road construction, hydrauli...

MATH vs MRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MRT
MRT
1.2× larger
MRT
$14.6M
$12.0M
MATH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MRT
MRT
+102.1% gap
MRT
63.1%
-39.0%
MATH

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Revenue
$12.0M
$14.6M
Net Profit
$-2.9M
Gross Margin
28.3%
49.4%
Operating Margin
-24.2%
-86.1%
Net Margin
-24.0%
Revenue YoY
-39.0%
63.1%
Net Profit YoY
-147.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.07
$-0.26

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
$12.0M
Q2 25
$14.6M
Q1 25
$24.8M
Q3 24
$19.7M
Q2 24
$8.9M
Net Profit
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
$-2.9M
Q2 25
Q1 25
$9.8M
Q3 24
$6.0M
Q2 24
Gross Margin
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
28.3%
Q2 25
49.4%
Q1 25
85.7%
Q3 24
49.5%
Q2 24
Operating Margin
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
-24.2%
Q2 25
-86.1%
Q1 25
39.3%
Q3 24
38.9%
Q2 24
-204.1%
Net Margin
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
-24.0%
Q2 25
Q1 25
39.6%
Q3 24
30.7%
Q2 24
EPS (diluted)
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
$-0.07
Q2 25
$-0.26
Q1 25
$0.25
Q3 24
$0.16
Q2 24
$-0.38

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$10.1M
$4.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$101.2K
$83.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$35.1M
$-73.2M
Total Assets
$413.8M
$17.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
$10.1M
Q2 25
$4.2M
Q1 25
$6.9M
Q3 24
$3.8M
Q2 24
$9.0M
Total Debt
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
$101.2K
Q2 25
$83.0M
Q1 25
$188.0K
Q3 24
$275.1K
Q2 24
$60.2M
Stockholders' Equity
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
$35.1M
Q2 25
$-73.2M
Q1 25
$36.6M
Q3 24
$25.3M
Q2 24
$-51.2M
Total Assets
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
$413.8M
Q2 25
$17.2M
Q1 25
$246.8M
Q3 24
$237.2M
Q2 24
$25.0M
Debt / Equity
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
0.00×
Q2 25
Q1 25
0.01×
Q3 24
0.01×
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$3.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
$3.3M
Q2 25
Q1 25
$16.2M
Q3 24
$-16.1M
Q2 24
Cash Conversion
MATH
MATH
MRT
MRT
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
1.64×
Q3 24
-2.66×
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons