vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd (MATH) and Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.4M vs $12.0M, roughly 1.0× Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd). Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -5.5% vs -24.0%, a 18.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18033.4% vs -39.0%).
Metalpha Technology Holding LtdMATHEarnings & Financial Report
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd is a global fintech firm specializing in digital asset wealth management, institutional-grade crypto investment services, and Web3 ecosystem infrastructure support. It serves professional investors, financial institutions, and high-net-worth clients across Asia, North America and Europe, with core segments including structured digital asset products, risk management solutions and DeFi technology development.
MATH vs PAVS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.0M | $12.4M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $-681.0K |
| Gross Margin | 28.3% | 20.0% |
| Operating Margin | -24.2% | -5.1% |
| Net Margin | -24.0% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -39.0% | 18033.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -147.7% | 61.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $12.0M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $0 |
| Q3 25 | $-2.9M | $-681.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $8.2M |
| Q3 25 | 28.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.5% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -24.2% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -24.0% | -5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.1M | $5.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $101.2K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $35.1M | $23.6M |
| Total Assets | $413.8M | $37.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.0M |
| Q3 25 | $101.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $188.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.1K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $35.1M | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $10.7M |
| Q3 25 | $413.8M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $246.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.2M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $11.2M |
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.3M | $-159.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-159.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-13.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.66× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
