vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd (MATH) and SCYNEXIS INC (SCYX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SCYNEXIS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.6M vs $12.0M, roughly 1.6× Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd). SCYNEXIS INC runs the higher net margin — 65.7% vs -24.0%, a 89.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SCYNEXIS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1808.5% vs -39.0%).
Metalpha Technology Holding LtdMATHEarnings & Financial Report
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd is a global fintech firm specializing in digital asset wealth management, institutional-grade crypto investment services, and Web3 ecosystem infrastructure support. It serves professional investors, financial institutions, and high-net-worth clients across Asia, North America and Europe, with core segments including structured digital asset products, risk management solutions and DeFi technology development.
SCYNEXIS Inc. is a biotechnology company focused on developing innovative antifungal therapies to address unmet medical needs for difficult-to-treat fungal infections. It targets hospital and specialty care markets, with key product candidates serving immunocompromised patients and other high-risk groups.
MATH vs SCYX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.0M | $18.6M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $12.3M |
| Gross Margin | 28.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -24.2% | 56.3% |
| Net Margin | -24.0% | 65.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -39.0% | 1808.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -147.7% | 376.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0M | $334.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $257.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $977.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $660.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $736.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.9M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $411.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.2% | -2516.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -701.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.3% | -3350.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.9% | -1563.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1255.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -692.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 65.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.0% | -2572.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -504.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | -2097.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | -425.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1964.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.16 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.1M | $40.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $101.2K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $35.1M | $49.4M |
| Total Assets | $413.8M | $59.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $37.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | $68.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $80.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.2K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $188.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $49.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.1M | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.6M | $50.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.3M | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $74.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $413.8M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $246.8M | $67.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $90.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.2M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $107.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $118.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.3M | $18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.1M | $765.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MATH
Segment breakdown not available.
SCYX
| Glaxosmithkline Intellectual Property | $17.2M | 92% |
| Products | $1.4M | 8% |
