vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) and Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Opendoor Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($736.0M vs $509.0M, roughly 1.4× Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.). Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -120.7% vs -148.9%, a 28.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Opendoor Technologies Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-32.1% vs -54.7%). Opendoor Technologies Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.0M vs $-322.3M).
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. is a Singapore-based company that designs and manufactures photovoltaic panels. The company was previously a division of the American company SunPower. Maxeon was spun off from SunPower in August 2020. Maxeon was the primary provider of solar panels for SunPower through March 2024. Beyond the United States, Maxeon has sales operations in more than 100 countries and has the rights to use the SunPower brand in countries outside the United States.
Opendoor Technologies Inc. is an online company that buys and sells residential real estate. Headquartered in San Francisco, it makes instant cash offers on homes through an online process, makes repairs on the properties it purchases and re-lists them for sale. It also provides mobile application-based home buying services along with financing. As of November 2021, the company operates in 44 markets in the US.
MAXN vs OPEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $509.0M | $736.0M |
| Net Profit | $-614.3M | $-1.1B |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.7% |
| Operating Margin | -113.3% | -20.4% |
| Net Margin | -120.7% | -148.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -54.7% | -32.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -122.7% | -869.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-96.00 | $-1.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $736.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $915.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $509.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-90.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-85.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-614.3M | $-113.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-78.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-109.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -113.3% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -148.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -120.7% | -10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-96.00 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.9M | $962.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.8M | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $376.3M | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $962.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $962.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $789.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $559.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.9M | $679.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $837.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $809.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $990.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $811.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $631.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $645.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-293.8M | $713.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $801.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $845.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $899.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $376.3M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.2M | $70.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-322.3M | $67.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -63.3% | 9.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.2% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $435.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $823.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-270.2M | $-80.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-399.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-178.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $432.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $821.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-283.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-322.3M | $-83.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-407.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-186.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -63.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -26.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -15.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
