vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and STEM, INC. (STEM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($88.5M vs $47.1M, roughly 1.9× STEM, INC.). Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. runs the higher net margin — 35.5% vs -33.9%, a 69.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs -15.6%). Over the past eight quarters, STEM, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (36.1% CAGR vs 14.3%).
Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc. was a bank holding company headquartered in Olney, Maryland and operating in the Washington metropolitan area. In addition to banking services, the company offered commercial and personal lines of insurance, surety bonds, workers compensation insurance, and professional liability insurance protection as well as financial planning, wealth management, and asset management for high-net-worth individuals, businesses, and associations. In April 2025, the company was acqu...
StemCells, Inc. is a public biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Newark, California, that is developing purified human neural stem cells (HuCNS-SCs) in the hopes of treating central nervous system disorders and paralysis. StemCells' HuCNS-SCs have the ability to differentiate into the three main types of cells found in the central nervous system: neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.
MCB vs STEM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $88.5M | $47.1M |
| Net Profit | $31.4M | $-16.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -17.7% |
| Net Margin | 35.5% | -33.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.4% | -15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 92.2% | 68.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.92 | $-4.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $88.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $88.4M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.8M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.3M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.6M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.5M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.7M | $34.0M |
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.9M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $-23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4M | $-51.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $-148.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8M | $-582.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 46.6% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | -33.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.1% | -34.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.1% | -65.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | -84.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | -493.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.3% | -1705.5% |
| Q1 26 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.6% | -33.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | -62.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.6% | 527.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.2% | -76.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.2% | -91.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.2% | -506.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.8% | -1712.6% |
| Q1 26 | $2.92 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.74 | $-4.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.67 | $-2.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.76 | $-1.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.45 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.89 | $-15.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.08 | $-18.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $-71.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $48.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.3M | $-249.4M |
| Total Assets | $8.8B | $308.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.6M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.9M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.5M | $58.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.3M | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $318.5M | $75.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $244.7M | $89.6M |
| Q1 26 | $948.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $743.1M | $-249.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $732.0M | $-235.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $723.0M | $-214.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $-417.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $729.8M | $-398.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $715.2M | $-344.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $692.4M | $-203.2M |
| Q1 26 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.3B | $308.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $362.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $379.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | $405.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3B | $437.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $691.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $88.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.5M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.3M | $-11.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | -0.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.10× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
