vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of MARCUS CORP (MCS) and Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Payoneer Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($217.0M vs $193.5M, roughly 1.1× MARCUS CORP). On growth, Payoneer Global Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.5% vs 2.8%). Payoneer Global Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($40.3M vs $26.4M). Over the past eight quarters, MARCUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs 16.3%).

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is an American company that provides real estate brokerage, mortgage brokerage, research, and advisory services in the U.S. and Canada in the field of commercial property. It popularized the practice of listing properties exclusively with one brokerage firm. The company has over 1,800 employees in more than 80 offices across the U.S. and Canada.

Payoneer Global Inc. is an American financial services company that provides online money transfer, digital payment services and provides customers with working capital.

MCS vs PAYO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PAYO
PAYO
1.1× larger
PAYO
$217.0M
$193.5M
MCS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PAYO
PAYO
+6.7% gap
PAYO
9.5%
2.8%
MCS
More free cash flow
PAYO
PAYO
$13.9M more FCF
PAYO
$40.3M
$26.4M
MCS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MCS
MCS
Annualised
MCS
18.2%
16.3%
PAYO

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Revenue
$193.5M
$217.0M
Net Profit
$19.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
0.9%
13.3%
Net Margin
8.8%
Revenue YoY
2.8%
9.5%
Net Profit YoY
4.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.05

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
$193.5M
$217.0M
Q3 25
$210.2M
$209.7M
Q2 25
$206.0M
$200.5M
Q1 25
$148.8M
$186.3M
Q4 24
$188.3M
$198.2M
Q3 24
$232.7M
$180.4M
Q2 24
$176.0M
$171.2M
Q1 24
$138.5M
$160.5M
Net Profit
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
$19.0M
Q3 25
$16.2M
$14.1M
Q2 25
$7.3M
$19.5M
Q1 25
$-16.8M
$20.6M
Q4 24
$986.0K
$18.2M
Q3 24
$23.3M
$41.6M
Q2 24
$-20.2M
$32.4M
Q1 24
$-11.9M
$29.0M
Operating Margin
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
0.9%
13.3%
Q3 25
10.8%
17.3%
Q2 25
6.3%
15.0%
Q1 25
-13.7%
15.7%
Q4 24
-1.2%
14.7%
Q3 24
14.1%
19.5%
Q2 24
1.3%
27.0%
Q1 24
-12.0%
23.9%
Net Margin
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
8.8%
Q3 25
7.7%
6.7%
Q2 25
3.6%
9.7%
Q1 25
-11.3%
11.0%
Q4 24
0.5%
9.2%
Q3 24
10.0%
23.1%
Q2 24
-11.5%
18.9%
Q1 24
-8.6%
18.1%
EPS (diluted)
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
$0.05
Q3 25
$0.04
Q2 25
$0.05
Q1 25
$0.05
Q4 24
$0.03
Q3 24
$0.11
Q2 24
$0.09
Q1 24
$0.08

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$23.4M
$415.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$159.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$457.4M
$704.4M
Total Assets
$1.0B
$9.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.35×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
$23.4M
$415.5M
Q3 25
$7.4M
$479.4M
Q2 25
$14.9M
$497.1M
Q1 25
$11.9M
$524.1M
Q4 24
$40.8M
$497.5M
Q3 24
$28.4M
$534.2M
Q2 24
$32.8M
$575.7M
Q1 24
$17.3M
$587.2M
Total Debt
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
$159.0M
Q3 25
$162.0M
Q2 25
$179.9M
Q1 25
$198.9M
Q4 24
$159.1M
Q3 24
$173.1M
Q2 24
$175.7M
Q1 24
$169.8M
Stockholders' Equity
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
$457.4M
$704.4M
Q3 25
$454.3M
$750.5M
Q2 25
$448.4M
$770.9M
Q1 25
$441.8M
$750.7M
Q4 24
$464.9M
$724.8M
Q3 24
$462.3M
$727.9M
Q2 24
$449.4M
$669.4M
Q1 24
$459.3M
$661.5M
Total Assets
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
$1.0B
$9.0B
Q3 25
$1.0B
$8.2B
Q2 25
$1.0B
$8.1B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$7.6B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$7.9B
Q3 24
$1.0B
$7.1B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$6.9B
Q1 24
$1.0B
$6.8B
Debt / Equity
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
0.35×
Q3 25
0.36×
Q2 25
0.40×
Q1 25
0.45×
Q4 24
0.34×
Q3 24
0.37×
Q2 24
0.39×
Q1 24
0.37×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$48.8M
$54.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$26.4M
$40.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.6%
18.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
11.6%
6.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.89×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$989.0K
$206.6M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
$48.8M
$54.9M
Q3 25
$39.1M
$54.2M
Q2 25
$31.6M
$70.7M
Q1 25
$-35.3M
$53.7M
Q4 24
$52.6M
$45.9M
Q3 24
$30.5M
$50.1M
Q2 24
$36.0M
$41.4M
Q1 24
$-15.1M
$39.5M
Free Cash Flow
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
$26.4M
$40.3M
Q3 25
$18.2M
$49.2M
Q2 25
$14.7M
$68.1M
Q1 25
$-58.3M
$49.0M
Q4 24
$27.1M
$42.1M
Q3 24
$12.0M
$48.5M
Q2 24
$16.1M
$40.2M
Q1 24
$-30.5M
$37.9M
FCF Margin
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
13.6%
18.6%
Q3 25
8.7%
23.5%
Q2 25
7.1%
34.0%
Q1 25
-39.2%
26.3%
Q4 24
14.4%
21.3%
Q3 24
5.2%
26.9%
Q2 24
9.2%
23.5%
Q1 24
-22.0%
23.6%
Capex Intensity
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
11.6%
6.7%
Q3 25
9.9%
2.4%
Q2 25
8.2%
1.3%
Q1 25
15.5%
2.5%
Q4 24
13.5%
1.9%
Q3 24
7.9%
0.9%
Q2 24
11.3%
0.7%
Q1 24
11.1%
1.0%
Cash Conversion
MCS
MCS
PAYO
PAYO
Q4 25
2.89×
Q3 25
2.41×
3.84×
Q2 25
4.32×
3.63×
Q1 25
2.61×
Q4 24
53.31×
2.52×
Q3 24
1.31×
1.21×
Q2 24
1.28×
Q1 24
1.36×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

MCS
MCS

Theatres$123.1M64%
Concessions$51.0M26%
Food And Beverage$21.2M11%

PAYO
PAYO

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons