vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (MDGL) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $321.1M, roughly 1.1× MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -10.8% vs -18.2%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (210.8% vs 15.6%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $-133.8M).
Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is an American biopharmaceutical company incorporated in 2002, focusing on the development of novel synthetic bile acid analogs to treat chronic liver diseases, such as primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) now called primary biliary cholangitis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, primary sclerosing cholangitis and also the intestinal disorder, bile acid diarrhea.
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
MDGL vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.1M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $-58.6M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | -18.6% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | -18.2% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 210.8% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.4% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.55 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.1M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $287.3M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $212.8M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $137.3M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.2M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-58.6M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-114.2M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.3M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-73.2M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.4M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-107.0M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-147.5M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 96.7% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | -18.6% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -39.7% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.2% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -57.8% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -64.8% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -187.1% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -18.2% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -39.8% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.9% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -53.4% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.5% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -172.0% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.55 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.08 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.90 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.32 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.50 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.92 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.38 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.7M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $339.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $602.7M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.56× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $198.7M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $295.7M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.2M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.6M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $232.7M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $622.5M | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | $339.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $339.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $602.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $625.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $696.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $710.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $754.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $777.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $850.8M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.14× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-133.5M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-133.8M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.7% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-133.5M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.8M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-47.1M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-88.9M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-104.5M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-67.0M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-149.2M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-133.8M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-104.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-67.8M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-149.5M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | -41.7% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -101.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -109.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MDGL
| Rebates Customer Fees Credits Co Pay Assistance And Other | $208.5M | 65% |
| Other | $76.0M | 24% |
| Chargebacks Discounts For Prompt Pay And Other Allowances | $36.6M | 11% |
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
