vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mediaco Holding Inc. (MDIA) and PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (PACB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.6M vs $38.7M, roughly 1.2× Mediaco Holding Inc.). Mediaco Holding Inc. runs the higher net margin — -83.6% vs -90.4%, a 6.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mediaco Holding Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.9% vs 13.8%). Mediaco Holding Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-460.0K vs $-19.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Mediaco Holding Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (140.1% CAGR vs 7.3%).
MediaCo Holding Inc. is an American media company with offices based in Burbank, California and New York City, owned by private equity firms HPS Investment Partners, LLC and Standard General. MediaCo caters to the African-American and the Spanish-speaking Hispanic communities. The company owns television and radio stations in several of the top multicultural markets, and is the parent company of the Estrella TV network.
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. is an American biotechnology company founded in 2004 that develops and manufactures systems for gene sequencing and some novel real time biological observation. PacBio has two principal sequencing platforms: single-molecule real-time sequencing (SMRT), based on the properties of zero-mode waveguides and sequencing by binding (SBB) chemistry, which uses native nucleotides and scarless incorporation for DNA binding and extension.
MDIA vs PACB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $38.7M | $44.6M |
| Net Profit | $-32.3M | $-40.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.1% |
| Operating Margin | -16.0% | -92.3% |
| Net Margin | -83.6% | -90.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.9% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -661.9% | -1802.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.39 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $38.7M | $44.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.0M | $37.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.8M | $39.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.9M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.2M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-32.3M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.9M | $-38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.4M | $-41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.6M | $-426.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.9M | $-60.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.3M | $-173.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.7M | $-78.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.1% |
| Q4 25 | -16.0% | -92.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.0% | -101.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.7% | -112.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.7% | -1154.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.8% | -390.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.0% | -160.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -50.9% | -488.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -51.7% | -209.6% |
| Q4 25 | -83.6% | -90.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.5% | -98.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.7% | -105.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.7% | -1146.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 184.0% | -151.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -184.4% | -481.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.8% | -201.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.39 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | $-1.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.19 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.66 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.75 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $279.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $46.3M | $5.3M |
| Total Assets | $291.1M | $784.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $279.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $314.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $389.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | $471.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $509.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $561.9M |
| Q4 25 | $46.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.7M | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.3M | $61.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.5M | $91.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.1M | $506.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.9M | $453.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $492.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.3M | $649.0M |
| Q4 25 | $291.1M | $784.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $319.4M | $803.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.1M | $825.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $317.7M | $860.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $325.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $338.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $325.5M | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $32.0K | $-19.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-460.0K | $-19.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.2% | -44.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.2M | $-114.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $32.0K | $-19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $-18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-44.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9M | $-30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.0M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | $-54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $412.0K | $-75.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-460.0K | $-19.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $-29.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-45.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.5M | $-32.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $-46.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.2M | $-55.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $386.0K | $-79.6M |
| Q4 25 | -1.2% | -44.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.2% | -75.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | -122.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.9% | -82.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.2% | -115.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -96.1% | -154.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | -205.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MDIA
| Video Segment | $26.4M | 68% |
| Advertising | $10.0M | 26% |
| Other | $1.7M | 4% |
| Service Other | $536.0K | 1% |
PACB
| Products | $39.0M | 87% |
| Service And Other | $5.7M | 13% |
