vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC (MDU) and TECK RESOURCES LTD (TECK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TECK RESOURCES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3B vs $522.6M, roughly 12.0× MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC).
MDU Resources Group, Inc. is a U.S.-based corporation supplying products and services to regulated energy delivery and utilities related construction materials and services businesses. It is headquartered in Bismarck, North Dakota, and operates in 48 states.
Teck Resources Limited is a diversified natural resources company headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, that is engaged in mining and mineral development, including coal for the steelmaking industry, copper, zinc, and energy. Secondary products include lead, silver, gold, molybdenum, germanium, indium and cadmium. Teck Resources was formed from the amalgamation of Teck and Cominco in 2001.
MDU vs TECK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $522.6M | $6.3B |
| Net Profit | $76.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | -3.0% |
| Net Margin | 14.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 38.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.37 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $522.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $313.6M | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $348.7M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $678.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $531.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $290.7M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $343.1M | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $588.2M | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | $76.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.0% |
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 39.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.4% | 49.0% |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.49 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.8B | — |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.97× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $80.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-336.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -64.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 79.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.06× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-297.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $165.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-336.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-95.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $673.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -64.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -38.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 79.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.16× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.65× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.26× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MDU
| Natural Gas Distribution | $382.8M | 73% |
| Commercial Utility Sales | $42.7M | 8% |
| Residential Utility Sales | $33.7M | 6% |
| Pipelineand Midstream | $31.1M | 6% |
| Natural Gas Transportation | $17.2M | 3% |
| Industrial Utility Sales | $10.1M | 2% |
| Natural Gas Storage | $6.4M | 1% |
| Other Utility Sales | $1.9M | 0% |
TECK
Segment breakdown not available.
