vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. (MEC) and POWELL INDUSTRIES INC (POWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

POWELL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($251.2M vs $134.3M, roughly 1.9× Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.). POWELL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs -3.2%, a 19.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.7% vs 4.0%). POWELL INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.6M vs $10.2M). Over the past eight quarters, POWELL INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (-0.8% CAGR vs -8.8%).

Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered leading manufacturer of metal components, fabricated assemblies, and custom engineered solutions. It serves OEM clients across agriculture, construction, transportation, defense, and power sports markets, offering end-to-end services from prototyping to high-volume production for North America.

Powell Industries, Inc. is a manufacturer of Integrated/Packaged Solutions and Electrical Equipment to monitor and control the distribution of electrical power in commercial and industrial markets founded in 1947. Its headquarters is in Houston, Texas.

MEC vs POWL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
POWL
POWL
1.9× larger
POWL
$251.2M
$134.3M
MEC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MEC
MEC
+6.6% gap
MEC
10.7%
4.0%
POWL
Higher net margin
POWL
POWL
19.7% more per $
POWL
16.5%
-3.2%
MEC
More free cash flow
POWL
POWL
$31.4M more FCF
POWL
$41.6M
$10.2M
MEC
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
POWL
POWL
Annualised
POWL
-0.8%
-8.8%
MEC

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Revenue
$134.3M
$251.2M
Net Profit
$-4.4M
$41.4M
Gross Margin
6.8%
28.4%
Operating Margin
-4.1%
17.0%
Net Margin
-3.2%
16.5%
Revenue YoY
10.7%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
-127.3%
19.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.22
$3.40

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
$134.3M
$251.2M
Q3 25
$144.3M
$298.0M
Q2 25
$132.3M
$286.3M
Q1 25
$135.6M
$278.6M
Q4 24
$121.3M
$241.4M
Q3 24
$135.4M
$275.1M
Q2 24
$163.6M
$288.2M
Q1 24
$161.3M
$255.1M
Net Profit
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
$-4.4M
$41.4M
Q3 25
$-2.7M
$51.4M
Q2 25
$-1.1M
$48.2M
Q1 25
$20.0K
$46.3M
Q4 24
$16.0M
$34.8M
Q3 24
$3.0M
$46.1M
Q2 24
$3.8M
$46.2M
Q1 24
$3.2M
$33.5M
Gross Margin
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
6.8%
28.4%
Q3 25
11.0%
31.4%
Q2 25
10.3%
30.7%
Q1 25
11.3%
29.9%
Q4 24
8.9%
24.7%
Q3 24
12.6%
29.2%
Q2 24
13.6%
28.4%
Q1 24
13.0%
24.6%
Operating Margin
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
-4.1%
17.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
21.2%
Q2 25
0.1%
21.0%
Q1 25
1.2%
21.1%
Q4 24
19.0%
14.7%
Q3 24
4.2%
20.4%
Q2 24
5.0%
19.9%
Q1 24
4.7%
15.5%
Net Margin
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
-3.2%
16.5%
Q3 25
-1.9%
17.3%
Q2 25
-0.8%
16.8%
Q1 25
0.0%
16.6%
Q4 24
13.2%
14.4%
Q3 24
2.2%
16.7%
Q2 24
2.3%
16.0%
Q1 24
2.0%
13.1%
EPS (diluted)
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
$-0.22
$3.40
Q3 25
$-0.13
$4.23
Q2 25
$-0.05
$3.96
Q1 25
$0.00
$3.81
Q4 24
$0.76
$2.86
Q3 24
$0.14
$3.77
Q2 24
$0.18
$3.79
Q1 24
$0.16
$2.75

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.5M
$500.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$240.7M
$668.9M
Total Assets
$563.6M
$1.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
$1.5M
$500.8M
Q3 25
$1.2M
$475.5M
Q2 25
$206.0K
$433.0M
Q1 25
$183.0K
$389.3M
Q4 24
$206.0K
$373.4M
Q3 24
$178.0K
$358.4M
Q2 24
$314.0K
$374.0M
Q1 24
$314.0K
$365.3M
Stockholders' Equity
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
$240.7M
$668.9M
Q3 25
$244.8M
$640.8M
Q2 25
$246.8M
$594.9M
Q1 25
$250.0M
$541.4M
Q4 24
$251.8M
$496.3M
Q3 24
$238.4M
$483.1M
Q2 24
$238.1M
$436.7M
Q1 24
$234.0M
$393.8M
Total Assets
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
$563.6M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$585.6M
$1.1B
Q2 25
$433.7M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$447.7M
$965.4M
Q4 24
$445.6M
$912.7M
Q3 24
$466.0M
$928.2M
Q2 24
$488.2M
$869.0M
Q1 24
$499.9M
$849.6M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$13.4M
$43.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$10.2M
$41.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.6%
16.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.4%
0.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.05×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$26.9M
$161.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
$13.4M
$43.6M
Q3 25
$1.9M
$61.1M
Q2 25
$15.0M
$47.4M
Q1 25
$8.3M
$22.4M
Q4 24
$38.0M
$37.1M
Q3 24
$17.9M
$-6.0M
Q2 24
$23.3M
$13.8M
Q1 24
$10.6M
$17.0M
Free Cash Flow
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
$10.2M
$41.6M
Q3 25
$-1.1M
$59.3M
Q2 25
$12.5M
$42.3M
Q1 25
$5.4M
$18.3M
Q4 24
$35.6M
$34.9M
Q3 24
$15.1M
$-14.4M
Q2 24
$19.2M
$12.4M
Q1 24
$7.8M
$16.1M
FCF Margin
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
7.6%
16.6%
Q3 25
-0.8%
19.9%
Q2 25
9.5%
14.8%
Q1 25
4.0%
6.6%
Q4 24
29.4%
14.4%
Q3 24
11.1%
-5.3%
Q2 24
11.7%
4.3%
Q1 24
4.9%
6.3%
Capex Intensity
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
2.4%
0.8%
Q3 25
2.1%
0.6%
Q2 25
1.8%
1.8%
Q1 25
2.2%
1.5%
Q4 24
1.9%
0.9%
Q3 24
2.1%
3.1%
Q2 24
2.5%
0.5%
Q1 24
1.7%
0.4%
Cash Conversion
MEC
MEC
POWL
POWL
Q4 25
1.05×
Q3 25
1.19×
Q2 25
0.98×
Q1 25
416.65×
0.48×
Q4 24
2.38×
1.07×
Q3 24
6.03×
-0.13×
Q2 24
6.15×
0.30×
Q1 24
3.28×
0.51×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

MEC
MEC

Fabrication$72.2M54%
Construction And Access$19.2M14%
Tubes$16.2M12%
Other Market$11.9M9%
Agriculture$7.7M6%
Military$6.7M5%
Outdoor Sports$1.7M1%

POWL
POWL

Oil And Gas Service$97.9M39%
Electricity$69.3M28%
Commercial And Other Industrial$40.6M16%
Petrochemical$22.8M9%
Other Customers$12.0M5%
Light Rail Traction Power Customer$8.6M3%

Related Comparisons