vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Functional Brands Inc. (MEHA) and VirTra, Inc (VTSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VirTra, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9M vs $1.7M, roughly 1.7× Functional Brands Inc.). Functional Brands Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs -27.2%, a 42.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Functional Brands Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.5M vs $-2.1M).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
VirTra, Inc. is a global provider of highly realistic immersive training simulators and supporting curriculum, primarily serving law enforcement agencies, military units, and public safety organizations. Its scenario-based training systems are designed to enhance frontline personnel's decision-making, de-escalation skills, and on-duty operational safety.
MEHA vs VTSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7M | $2.9M |
| Net Profit | $259.0K | $-792.4K |
| Gross Margin | 57.7% | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | -4.6% | -47.9% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | -27.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 10.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-792.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0K | $-388.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $175.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-888.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $583.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $468.2K |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.7% | 65.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 72.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 67.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 90.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 64.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -47.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0M | $18.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $141.3K | $7.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $604.7K | $45.6M |
| Total Assets | $8.2M | $65.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.23× | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $604.7K | $46.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $46.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $45.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $65.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $66.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $69.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.5M | $-2.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 86.8% | -72.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 21.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $2.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $36.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-908.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $897.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $-61.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-362.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $814.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 86.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -64.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.71× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
