vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MERCADOLIBRE INC (MELI) and Sea Ltd (SE), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sea Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.9B vs $6.1B, roughly 3.7× MERCADOLIBRE INC). MERCADOLIBRE INC runs the higher net margin — 9.1% vs 7.0%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sea Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (363.4% vs 40.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Sea Ltd's revenue compounded faster (147.8% CAGR vs 40.7%).
MercadoLibre, Inc., known as Mercado Livre in Brazil, literally meaning "free market" in both languages, is a company of Argentine origin and incorporated in Delaware in the United States that operates online marketplaces dedicated to e-commerce and online auctions. As of 2016, Mercado Libre had 174.2 million users in Latin America, making it the region's most popular e-commerce site by number of visitors.
Sea Limited is a tech conglomerate headquartered in Singapore. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with revenue of US$16.8 billion (2024). Sea currently functions as a holding company for Garena, Monee and Shopee, the largest e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia.
MELI vs SE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1B | $22.9B |
| Net Profit | $559.0M | $1.6B |
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | 8.7% |
| Net Margin | 9.1% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 40.2% | 363.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $11.03 | $2.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $559.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.0M | $375.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $523.0M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $494.0M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $639.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $397.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $531.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $344.0M | $-23.0M |
| Q4 25 | 61.7% | 44.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.7% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.4% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.1% | 46.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 65.3% | 41.6% |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.0% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | -0.6% |
| Q4 25 | $11.03 | $2.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.32 | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.31 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.74 | $0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.60 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.83 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.48 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.78 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.3B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.7B | $12.6B |
| Total Assets | $42.7B | $29.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.68× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $42.7B | $29.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2B | $22.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.2B | $5.0B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.8B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 77.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 7.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 9.32× | 3.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $10.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $756.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $468.5M |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 77.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.32× | 3.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.03× | 9.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.58× | 5.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.58× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.40× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MELI
| Commerce | $2.8B | 45% |
| Argentina Segment | $1.6B | 26% |
| Products | $1.2B | 20% |
| Other Countries Segment | $414.0M | 7% |
SE
Segment breakdown not available.
