vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Meta Platforms (META) and Match Group (MTCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Meta Platforms is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($59.9B vs $878.0M, roughly 68.2× Match Group). Meta Platforms runs the higher net margin — 38.0% vs 23.9%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Meta Platforms posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.8% vs 2.1%). Meta Platforms produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.8B vs $308.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Meta Platforms's revenue compounded faster (28.2% CAGR vs 1.1%).
Meta Platforms, Inc. is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Menlo Park, California. Meta owns and operates several prominent social media platforms and communication services, including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, Threads and Manus. The company also operates an advertising network for its own sites and third parties; as of 2023, advertising accounted for 97.8 percent of its total revenue. Meta has been described as a Big Tech company.
Match Group, Inc. is an American internet and technology company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It owns and operates the largest global portfolio of popular online dating services including Tinder, Match.com, Meetic, OkCupid, Hinge, Plenty of Fish, Azar, and other dating global brands. The company was owned by IAC until July 2020 when Match Group was spun off as a separate, public company. As of 2019, the company had 9.3 million subscribers, of which 4.6 million were in North America. Japan ...
META vs MTCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $59.9B | $878.0M |
| Net Profit | $22.8B | $209.7M |
| Gross Margin | 81.8% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | 41.3% | 32.4% |
| Net Margin | 38.0% | 23.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.8% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.3% | 32.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $8.87 | $0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $59.9B | $878.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2B | $914.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.5B | $863.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.3B | $831.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.4B | $860.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.6B | $895.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.1B | $864.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.5B | $859.6M |
| Q4 25 | $22.8B | $209.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $160.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3B | $125.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $117.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.8B | $158.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7B | $136.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5B | $133.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4B | $123.2M |
| Q4 25 | 81.8% | 74.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.0% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.1% | 72.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 82.1% | 71.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.7% | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.8% | 71.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | 71.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.8% | 70.1% |
| Q4 25 | 41.3% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.3% | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.0% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.9% | 21.5% |
| Q4 25 | 38.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.5% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.9% | 14.3% |
| Q4 25 | $8.87 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.05 | $0.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.14 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.43 | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.96 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.03 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.16 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.71 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $81.6B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $58.7B | $3.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $217.2B | $-253.5M |
| Total Assets | $366.0B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.27× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $81.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.1B | $340.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.2B | $414.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8B | $970.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.9B | $860.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.1B | $843.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.1B | $920.9M |
| Q4 25 | $58.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | $217.2B | $-253.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.1B | $-223.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $195.1B | $-230.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $185.0B | $-182.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.6B | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.5B | $-88.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.8B | $-130.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.5B | $-107.8M |
| Q4 25 | $366.0B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $303.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $294.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $280.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $222.8B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $36.2B | $322.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.8B | $308.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.8% | 35.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 35.7% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.59× | 1.54× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $46.1B | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $322.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0B | $320.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6B | $243.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.0B | $193.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.0B | $254.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.7B | $264.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.4B | $129.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.2B | $284.1M |
| Q4 25 | $14.8B | $308.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2B | $306.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0B | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.1B | $177.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.6B | $247.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.5B | $251.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $116.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $266.9M |
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 33.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.2% | 31.0% |
| Q4 25 | 35.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.59× | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.07× | 1.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.39× | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | 1.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.58× | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.44× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 2.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
META
| Advertising | $58.1B | 97% |
| Reality Labs | $955.0M | 2% |
| Service Other | $801.0M | 1% |
MTCH
| Tinder Segment | $479.3M | 55% |
| Hinge Segment | $186.5M | 21% |
| Evergreen And Emerging Segment | $148.1M | 17% |
| MG Asia Segment | $65.8M | 7% |
