vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MFA FINANCIAL, INC. (MFA) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MFA FINANCIAL, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($55.5M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.4× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). On growth, MFA FINANCIAL, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs 1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs 7.7%).
MFA Financial, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in investing in and managing residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, mortgage loans, and other real estate-related financial assets. It caters primarily to institutional and individual investors across the U.S., focusing on delivering stable risk-adjusted returns via rigorous asset screening and risk management frameworks.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
MFA vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $55.5M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 97.9% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.2% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $55.5M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.8M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.5M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.8M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.6M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.5M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.8M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.2M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.2M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.2M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.9M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.2M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 97.9% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.5% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.5% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 98.2% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 79.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.7% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.7% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.2% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 95.2% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 78.4% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.5% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.37 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $213.2M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $13.0B | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $213.2M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.2M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.7M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.7M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $338.9M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.6M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $289.4M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $306.3M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.1B | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7B | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5B | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.4B | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2B | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.9B | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.2M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $76.2M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.7M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.5M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.6M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.3M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.5M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.5M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.31× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.35× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.23× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.11× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.30× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MFA
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
