vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MANULIFE FINANCIAL CORP (MFC) and TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD (TSM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.5B vs $29.4B, roughly 1.2× MANULIFE FINANCIAL CORP). TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD runs the higher net margin — 50.5% vs 12.1%, a 38.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Manulife Financial Corporation is a Canadian multinational insurance company and financial services provider headquartered in Toronto, Ontario. The company operates in Canada and Asia as "Manulife" and in the United States primarily through its John Hancock Financial division. As of December 2021, the company employed approximately 38,000 people and had 119,000 agents under contract, and has CA$1.4 trillion in assets under management and administration. Manulife at one point serviced over 26 ...
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) is the world's largest dedicated independent semiconductor foundry, headquartered in Hsinchu, Taiwan. It manufactures advanced logic chips on contract for fabless customers including Apple, NVIDIA, AMD, Qualcomm, and Broadcom, and leads the industry in leading-edge process nodes (3nm/5nm/7nm).
MFC vs TSM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.4B | $35.5B |
| Net Profit | $3.5B | $17.9B |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 58.0% |
| Net Margin | 12.1% | 50.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.83 | $111.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $35.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $32.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $88.3B | ||
| Q3 22 | $29.4B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $17.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.3B | ||
| Q3 22 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 66.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 62.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 58.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 58.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 53.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 48.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 22 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 14.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $111.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $98.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $76.80 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $69.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 22 | $1.83 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $1.25 | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $13.2K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.7B | ||
| Q3 22 | $13.2K | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $8.4K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.5B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
