vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of mF International Ltd (MFI) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zscaler, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($788.1M vs $1.9M, roughly 410.5× mF International Ltd). Zscaler, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.5% vs -90.9%, a 89.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zscaler, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 20.2%). Zscaler, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($431.0M vs $-339.2K).
MF Global Holdings Ltd., formerly known as Man Financial, was a major global financial derivatives broker, or commodities brokerage firm that went bankrupt in 2011. MF Global provided exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures and options as well as over-the-counter products such as contracts for difference (CFDs), foreign exchange and spread betting. MF Global Inc., its broker-dealer subsidiary, was a primary dealer in United States Treasury securities. A series of perceived liquidity prob...
Zscaler, Inc. is an American cloud security company based in San Jose, California. The company offers cloud-based services to protect enterprise networks and data.
MFI vs ZS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $788.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $-11.6M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 76.6% |
| Operating Margin | -93.4% | -4.6% |
| Net Margin | -90.9% | -1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -145.6% | 3.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $788.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $719.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $678.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $647.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $628.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $592.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $553.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $525.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-710.3K | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.5% | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 78.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.4% | 78.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 77.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -93.4% | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -50.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -90.9% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $518.6K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.8M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $5.6M | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $518.6K | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $958.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.16× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-335.3K | $448.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-339.2K | $431.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -17.7% | 54.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $924.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $448.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $250.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-335.3K | $211.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $331.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $173.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $142.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $190.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-339.2K | $138.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $164.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $314.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $154.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $137.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $111.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.7% | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -142.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
