vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP (MFIN) and Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($70.6M vs $35.2M, roughly 2.0× Voyager Technologies, Inc.). MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs -130.4%, a 147.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs 2.1%).
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (MMFSL) is an Indian rural non-banking financial company headquartered in Mumbai. It is amongst the top tractor financers in India, with 1000+ offices across the country.
MFIN vs VOYG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $70.6M | $35.2M |
| Net Profit | $12.2M | $-45.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | -4.4% |
| Operating Margin | 29.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | -130.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.4% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.3% | -64.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.6M | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.6M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | -60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.1% | -52.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -130.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.3% | -70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.7% | -68.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.50 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.46 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.30 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.3M | $429.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $216.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $408.6M | $404.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.53× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $429.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.3M | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.5M | $413.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.4M | $468.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $232.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $404.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $408.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.4M | $590.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $389.9M | $554.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $380.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $370.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $354.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $727.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $685.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.65× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $126.3M | $-39.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-66.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -189.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 10.35× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-263.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-39.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $126.3M | $-60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.0M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.7M | $-30.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-66.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-88.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -189.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -135.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -194.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 97.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 126.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.72× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.86× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.89× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
