vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGIC SOFTWARE ENTERPRISES LTD (MGIC) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGIC SOFTWARE ENTERPRISES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($419.6M vs $221.4M, roughly 1.9× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). MAGIC SOFTWARE ENTERPRISES LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 0.2%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Magic Software Enterprises provides low-code integration and data management platforms that simplify the connection between legacy on-premise systems and modern cloud applications. Its flagship products — Magic xpi Integration Platform and FactoryEye Smart Factory Solution, enable enterprises to achieve end-to-end visibility, faster cloud migration, and managed integration services.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
MGIC vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2023 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $419.6M | $221.4M |
| Net Profit | $35.3M | $433.0K |
| Gross Margin | 27.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 0.2% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -60.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $221.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $433.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $83.1M | $162.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $127.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $276.3M | $339.9M |
| Total Assets | $505.1M | $852.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $339.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $852.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $40.3M | $7.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.14× | 16.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $98.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
