vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp (MGY) and Cloudflare, Inc. (NET). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cloudflare, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($614.5M vs $317.6M, roughly 1.9× Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp runs the higher net margin — 21.6% vs -2.0%, a 23.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cloudflare, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.6% vs -2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Cloudflare, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.4% CAGR vs -0.3%).
Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.
Cloudflare, Inc. is an American technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California, that provides a range of internet services, including content delivery network (CDN) services, cloud cybersecurity, DDoS mitigation, and ICANN-accredited domain registration. The company's services act primarily as a reverse proxy between website visitors and a customer's hosting provider, improving performance and protecting against malicious traffic.
MGY vs NET — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $317.6M | $614.5M |
| Net Profit | $68.8M | $-12.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.6% | -8.0% |
| Net Margin | 21.6% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.7% | 33.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.7% | 6.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $317.6M | $614.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $324.9M | $562.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.0M | $512.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $350.3M | $479.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.6M | $459.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.1M | $430.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.7M | $401.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.4M | $378.6M |
| Q4 25 | $68.8M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.1M | $-50.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.9M | $-38.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.8M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.6M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.1M | $-35.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 77.5% |
| Q4 25 | 29.6% | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.0% | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.7% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.9% | -8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | -14.4% |
| Q4 25 | 21.6% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.5% | -9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.0% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.6% | -9.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $266.8M | $943.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $393.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $6.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $266.8M | $943.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $280.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $251.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $247.6M | $204.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.0M | $147.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.1M | $182.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $275.7M | $157.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $399.3M | $254.4M |
| Q4 25 | $393.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $392.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $394.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $393.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $881.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $797.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $208.4M | $190.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $105.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 17.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $287.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $208.4M | $190.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.1M | $167.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.7M | $99.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.5M | $145.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $222.6M | $127.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $217.9M | $104.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.4M | $74.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.9M | $73.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $82.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $39.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $59.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $41.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.82× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.48× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MGY
| Oil And Condensate | $215.6M | 68% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $52.9M | 17% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $49.1M | 15% |
NET
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $438.5M | 71% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $176.0M | 29% |
