vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp (MGY) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($317.6M vs $200.5M, roughly 1.6× ROGERS CORP). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp runs the higher net margin — 21.6% vs 2.2%, a 19.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs -2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp's revenue compounded faster (-0.3% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
MGY vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $317.6M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $68.8M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 21.6% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.7% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.7% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $317.6M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $324.9M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.0M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $350.3M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.6M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.1M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.7M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.5M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.1M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.9M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.8M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.6M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.0% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.9% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.5% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $266.8M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $393.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.8M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $280.5M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $251.8M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $247.6M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.0M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.1M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $275.7M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $392.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $394.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $208.4M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.03× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $208.4M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.1M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $222.6M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $217.9M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.4M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.03× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.82× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MGY
| Oil And Condensate | $215.6M | 68% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $52.9M | 17% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $49.1M | 15% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
