vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp (MGY) and Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rackspace Technology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($682.8M vs $358.5M, roughly 1.9× Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp runs the higher net margin — 28.1% vs -4.8%, a 32.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -0.4%). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $56.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp's revenue compounded faster (3.2% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.
Rackspace Technology, Inc. is an American cloud computing company based in San Antonio, Texas. It also has offices in Reston, Virginia, as well as in Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, India, Dubai, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, Singapore, Mexico, Toronto and Hong Kong. Its data centers are located in Amsterdam (Netherlands), Virginia (USA), Chicago (USA), Dallas (USA), London (UK), Frankfurt (Germany), Hong Kong (China), Kansas City (USA), New York City (USA), San Jose (USA), Shangh...
MGY vs RXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $358.5M | $682.8M |
| Net Profit | $100.8M | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.6% |
| Operating Margin | 35.6% | -0.5% |
| Net Margin | 28.1% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.3% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.0% | 41.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $358.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $317.6M | $682.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $324.9M | $671.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.0M | $666.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $350.3M | $665.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.6M | $685.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.1M | $675.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.7M | $684.9M |
| Q1 26 | $100.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.8M | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.5M | $-67.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.1M | $-54.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.9M | $-71.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6M | $-56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.8M | $-186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.6M | $25.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.2% |
| Q1 26 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.0% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.7% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.9% | -7.9% |
| Q1 26 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.6% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | -10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.5% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | -10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.0% | -27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.4M | $105.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $-1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $124.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.8M | $105.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $280.5M | $99.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $251.8M | $103.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $247.6M | $128.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.0M | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.1M | $157.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $275.7M | $190.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $393.1M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.7M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $392.5M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.8M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $394.1M | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $-1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $-949.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $-756.2M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $197.6M | $59.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $145.6M | $56.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 40.6% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 35.9% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.96× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $90.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $197.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $208.4M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.1M | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.7M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $222.6M | $54.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $217.9M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.4M | $24.1M |
| Q1 26 | $145.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.5M |
| Q1 26 | 40.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.1% |
| Q1 26 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.82× | 0.96× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MGY
| Natural gas (Mcf/d) | $193.1M | 54% |
| Natural gas revenues | $51.8M | 14% |
| Natural gas liquids revenues | $49.4M | 14% |
| Oil (Bbls/d) | $40.7M | 11% |
| Natural gas (MMcf) | $17.4M | 5% |
| Oil (MBbls) | $3.7M | 1% |
| Natural gas liquids (MBbls) | $2.7M | 1% |
RXT
| Public Cloud Services Segment | $442.2M | 65% |
| Private Cloud Service Segment | $240.6M | 35% |
