vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp (MGY) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($317.6M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.3× Tecnoglass Inc.). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp runs the higher net margin — 21.6% vs 10.6%, a 11.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tecnoglass Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs -2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs -0.3%).
Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
MGY vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $317.6M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $68.8M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 29.6% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 21.6% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.7% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.7% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $317.6M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $324.9M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.0M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $350.3M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.6M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.1M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.7M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.4M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $68.8M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.5M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.1M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.8M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.6M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.1M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | 29.6% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.9% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 21.6% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.6% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $266.8M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $393.3M | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $266.8M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $280.5M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $251.8M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $247.6M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.0M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.1M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $275.7M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $399.3M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | $393.3M | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $393.1M | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.7M | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $392.5M | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.8M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $394.1M | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $393.5M | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.20× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.20× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.20× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.20× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $208.4M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.03× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $208.4M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.1M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.7M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.5M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $222.6M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $217.9M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.4M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.9M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.03× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.54× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.60× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.82× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.48× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MGY
| Oil And Condensate | $215.6M | 68% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $52.9M | 17% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $49.1M | 15% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
