vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of McGraw Hill, Inc. (MH) and StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
StubHub Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($468.1M vs $434.2M, roughly 1.1× McGraw Hill, Inc.). McGraw Hill, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4.7% vs -276.6%, a 271.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, StubHub Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs -35.1%). McGraw Hill, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.4M vs $180.3M).
McGraw Hill, Inc. is an American education science company that provides educational content, software, and services for students and educators across various levels—from K-12 to higher education and professional settings. They produce textbooks, digital learning tools, and adaptive technology to enhance learning experiences and outcomes. It is one of the "big three" educational publishers along with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and Pearson Education. McGraw Hill also publishes reference and tra...
StubHub Holdings operates a leading global online ticket marketplace for live entertainment events. It facilitates secure resale and direct purchase of tickets for concerts, sports matches, theater performances and other live experiences, serving consumers, event organizers and sellers across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
MH vs STUB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $434.2M | $468.1M |
| Net Profit | $-20.2M | $-1.3B |
| Gross Margin | 85.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | -292.3% |
| Net Margin | -4.7% | -276.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -35.1% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -119.2% | -3821.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-4.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $434.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $669.2M | $468.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $535.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $433.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-20.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.3M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-33.0M |
| Q4 25 | 85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | -292.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | -276.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.57 | $-4.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $514.4M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $1.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $775.3M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.36× | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $514.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $463.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $247.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $775.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $794.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $815.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.52× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $309.0M | $181.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $285.4M | $180.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 65.7% | 38.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.4% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $309.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | $181.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-96.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $285.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.8M | $180.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-112.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 65.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.4% | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.52× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -192.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MH
| Higher Education | $225.4M | 52% |
| Digital | $103.5M | 24% |
| Other | $44.4M | 10% |
| Global Professional | $36.2M | 8% |
| $24.7M | 6% |
STUB
| Transaction Fees | $453.4M | 97% |
| Other | $14.7M | 3% |
