vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mohawk Industries (MHK) and SONOCO PRODUCTS CO (SON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mohawk Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.6× SONOCO PRODUCTS CO). Mohawk Industries runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 4.1%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mohawk Industries posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.0% vs -1.9%). Mohawk Industries produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.8M vs $-428.3B). Over the past eight quarters, SONOCO PRODUCTS CO's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Mohawk Industries is an American flooring manufacturer based in Calhoun, Georgia. Mohawk produces floor covering products for residential and commercial applications in North America and residential applications in Europe. The company manufacturing portfolio consists of soft flooring products, hard flooring products, laminate flooring, sheet vinyl and luxury vinyl tile, natural stone and quartz countertops. In Europe, the company also produces and sells insulation, panels and mezzanine flooring.
Sonoco Products Company is an American provider of diversified consumer packaging, industrial products, protective packaging, and packaging supply chain services and the world's largest producer of composite cans, tubes, and cores. The company was founded in 1889 as Southern Novelty Company with annualized net sales of approximately $7.3 billion. Sonoco has 19,900 employees in more than 335 operations in 33 countries, serving more than 85 nations. The company is headquartered in Hartsville, S...
MHK vs SON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $117.1M | $68.0M |
| Gross Margin | 23.5% | 20.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.0% | -1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.3% | 24.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.90 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $117.1M | $68.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.0M | $332.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.8M | $122.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.5M | $493.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $54.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.0M | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.4M | $90.8M |
| Q1 26 | 23.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.1% | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 22.0% |
| Q1 26 | 4.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 8.6% |
| Q1 26 | 4.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.90 | $0.68 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.69 | $3.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.75 | $1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.34 | $4.96 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.15 | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.55 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $872.3M | $224.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7B | $3.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.4B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $13.8B | $11.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | 0.97× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $872.3M | $224.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $856.1M | $378.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $516.2M | $244.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.7M | $329.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $702.5M | $181.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $666.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $497.4M | $140.2M |
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $13.8B | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.7B | $11.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6B | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8B | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4B | $12.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.21× | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | 1.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $110.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.8M | $-428.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.3% | -25554.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | 3601.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $709.4M | $-427.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $110.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $459.6M | $412.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $386.6M | $291.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.3M | $193.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-208.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $397.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.6M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.6M | $109.3M |
| Q1 26 | $7.8M | $-428.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $265.2M | $322.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $310.3M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.1M | $98.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-85.4M | $-300.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $204.2M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.2M | $16.0M |
| Q1 26 | 0.3% | -25554.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.4% | -17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | 3.7% | 3601.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.94× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.55× | 2.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | 0.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | -3.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.97× | 3.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.48× | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MHK
| Global Ceramic | $1.1B | 40% |
| Flooring NA | $880.0M | 32% |
| Flooring ROW | $751.3M | 28% |
SON
| Consumer Packaging | $1.1B | 65% |
| Industrial Paper Packaging | $579.4M | 35% |
| All Other | $55.1M | 3% |
