vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mohawk Industries (MHK) and TUTOR PERINI CORP (TPC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mohawk Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.8× TUTOR PERINI CORP). Mohawk Industries runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 1.9%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TUTOR PERINI CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (41.2% vs 8.0%). TUTOR PERINI CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($98.7M vs $7.8M). Over the past eight quarters, TUTOR PERINI CORP's revenue compounded faster (19.9% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Mohawk Industries is an American flooring manufacturer based in Calhoun, Georgia. Mohawk produces floor covering products for residential and commercial applications in North America and residential applications in Europe. The company manufacturing portfolio consists of soft flooring products, hard flooring products, laminate flooring, sheet vinyl and luxury vinyl tile, natural stone and quartz countertops. In Europe, the company also produces and sells insulation, panels and mezzanine flooring.
Tutor Perini Corporation is one of the largest general contractors in the United States. It was formed by the merger of Perini Corporation and Tutor-Saliba Corporation in 2008. As of 2024, it reported annual revenue of approximately $4.33 billion. Tutor Perini is headquartered in Sylmar, California, and works on construction projects throughout North America. Specific areas of focus are civil infrastructure such as bridges, highways, tunnels, airports, and mass transit systems, building infra...
MHK vs TPC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $117.1M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | 23.5% | 9.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.0% | 41.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.3% | 136.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.90 | $0.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $117.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.0M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.5M | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $28.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $-79.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.0M | $-100.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.4M | $812.0K |
| Q1 26 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.1% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | -8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 3.6% |
| Q1 26 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | -7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.90 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.69 | $0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.75 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.34 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.15 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.49 | $-1.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.55 | $-1.92 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $872.3M | $734.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7B | $407.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.4B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $13.8B | $5.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $872.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $856.1M | $734.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $516.2M | $695.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.7M | $526.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $702.5M | $276.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $666.6M | $455.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.0M | $287.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $497.4M | $267.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $407.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $413.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $419.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $534.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $681.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $676.4M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.30× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.52× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $110.1M | $173.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.8M | $98.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.3% | 6.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | 6.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $709.4M | $567.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $110.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $459.6M | $173.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $386.6M | $289.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.3M | $262.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $22.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $397.0M | $329.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.6M | $53.1M |
| Q1 26 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $265.2M | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $310.3M | $240.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.1M | $235.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-85.4M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.2M | $320.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $204.2M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.2M | $42.2M |
| Q1 26 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.4% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.94× | 6.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.55× | 79.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | 13.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | 0.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.48× | 65.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MHK
| Global Ceramic | $1.1B | 40% |
| Flooring NA | $880.0M | 32% |
| Flooring ROW | $751.3M | 28% |
TPC
| State And Local Agencies | $591.1M | 39% |
| Mass Transit | $449.9M | 30% |
| Federal Agencies | $115.0M | 8% |
| Bridges | $100.5M | 7% |
| Military Facilities | $93.1M | 6% |
| Commercial And Industrial Facilities | $46.7M | 3% |
| Detention Facilities | $43.8M | 3% |
| Power And Energy | $35.8M | 2% |
| Multi Unit Residential | $25.9M | 2% |
| Education Facilities | $12.0M | 1% |
| Water | $3.6M | 0% |
