vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO) and NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEWELL BRANDS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× M/I HOMES, INC.). M/I HOMES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -16.6%, a 22.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEWELL BRANDS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.7% vs -4.8%). NEWELL BRANDS INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($91.0M vs $-13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, NEWELL BRANDS INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 4.7%).
M/I Homes, Inc. is a leading U.S. residential construction company that designs, builds and sells single-family homes, townhomes and duplexes across multiple U.S. states. It caters to entry-level, move-up and luxury homebuyers, offering energy-efficient designs, flexible floor plans and personalized customization options.
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
MHO vs NWL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $64.0M | $-315.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | -14.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | -16.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.8% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -52.1% | -483.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.42 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $976.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $64.0M | $-315.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.5M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.2M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.2M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.5M | $-54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.4M | $-198.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.1M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.7% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.1% | 30.5% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.6% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $2.42 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.92 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.42 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.98 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.71 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.10 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.12 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.78 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $203.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | $10.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $229.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $494.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $372.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $3.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $12.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.7M | $161.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0M | $91.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.1% | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $127.7M | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.7M | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.4M | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.8M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.9M | $-213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.4M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-67.9M | $282.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.5M | $32.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.8M | $32.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.0M | $91.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.0M | $315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $-117.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.5M | $-272.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.3M | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-68.5M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.5M | $-27.0M |
| Q4 25 | -1.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | -17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 17.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.31× | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.84× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MHO
| Southern Homebuilding | $615.6M | 54% |
| Northern Homebuilding | $503.9M | 44% |
| Financial Service | $27.8M | 2% |
| Land | $4.7M | 0% |
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
