vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC (MIND) and Nurix Therapeutics, Inc. (NRIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nurix Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.6M vs $9.7M, roughly 1.4× MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC). MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -576.1%, a 576.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nurix Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -20.0%). MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($801.0K vs $-73.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Nurix Therapeutics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-9.5% CAGR vs -14.9%).
Mitcham Industries, Inc. is a company founded in 1987, and is based in Huntsville, Texas. The company markets geophysical and other equipment to seismic data acquisition contractors conducting surveys on land, marsh, and marine areas, both shallow and deep water. There are mainly two segments operating in the company, namely an Equipment Leasing segment and an Equipment Manufacturing segment. In October 2011, the Company opened a new logistics and repair facility in Budapest, Hungary, and thr...
Nurix Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing novel targeted protein degradation therapies for cancer, immune disorders and other serious unmet medical needs. Its core pipeline leverages proprietary E3 ubiquitin ligase modulation technology, with operations primarily based in the United States and collaborative partnerships with global pharmaceutical firms.
MIND vs NRIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.7M | $13.6M |
| Net Profit | $62.0K | $-78.2M |
| Gross Margin | 46.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | -612.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | -576.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.0% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -95.2% | -33.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.7M | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0M | $18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | $62.0K | $-78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $-86.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-970.0K | $-43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-56.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-58.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $798.0K | $-49.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $954.0K | $-44.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-41.5M |
| Q4 25 | 46.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | -612.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | -1157.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.3% | -109.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.5% | -340.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | -486.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | -433.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | -401.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.3% | -272.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -576.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | -1094.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.3% | -98.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | -305.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | -440.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | -388.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | -368.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.8% | -250.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.76 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.4M | $247.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.9M | $538.7M |
| Total Assets | $47.3M | $688.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.4M | $247.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $84.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $75.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $110.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $924.0K | $116.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $49.8M |
| Q4 25 | $39.9M | $538.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $372.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | $447.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $480.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $527.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.5M | $376.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6M | $370.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.6M | $168.7M |
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | $688.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $522.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.2M | $591.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.7M | $615.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | $669.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.8M | $513.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.9M | $511.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.5M | $312.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $894.0K | $-67.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $801.0K | $-73.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.3% | -537.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 37.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 14.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.1M | $-263.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $894.0K | $-67.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $-57.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $-63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-61.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $-48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-42.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.8M | $-39.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.0K | $-42.0M |
| Q4 25 | $801.0K | $-73.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $-60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8M | $-65.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $-64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $-50.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $978.0K | $-44.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.8M | $-41.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $566.0K | $-44.8M |
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | -537.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.9% | -761.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.5% | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | -349.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.3% | -382.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | -353.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -49.8% | -344.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.2% | -270.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | 14.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MIND
Segment breakdown not available.
NRIX
| Pfizer | $11.9M | 88% |
| Gilead Agreement | $1.7M | 13% |
