vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MITEK SYSTEMS INC (MITK) and Xerox Holdings Corp (XRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Xerox Holdings Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $44.2M, roughly 45.8× MITEK SYSTEMS INC). On growth, Xerox Holdings Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.7% vs 18.8%). Xerox Holdings Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($192.0M vs $6.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Xerox Holdings Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.2% CAGR vs -2.9%).
Mitek Systems, Inc. is a software company that specializes in digital identity verification and mobile image processing using artificial intelligence. The company's software is used for depositing checks and opening bank accounts via mobile devices. It also verifies identity documents such as passports, ID cards, and driver's licenses by analyzing a selfie of an individual holding their ID, comparing their face to the photo on the document.
Xerox Corporation is an American corporation that sells printers, digital document products and services in more than 160 countries. Xerox was the pioneer of the photocopier market, beginning with the introduction of the Xerox 914 in 1959, so much so that the word xerox is commonly used as a synonym for photocopy. Xerox is headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut, though it is incorporated in New York with its largest group of employees based around Rochester, New York, where the company was fou...
MITK vs XRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.2M | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $2.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 18.8% | 25.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 160.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.0M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $-760.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $-106.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2M | $-90.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0K | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $282.0K | $-113.0M |
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | -38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | -78.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | -7.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-6.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $-9.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $190.1M | $512.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.8M | $4.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $233.7M | $444.0M |
| Total Assets | $446.5M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | 9.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $190.1M | $512.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $193.0M | $479.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.1M | $449.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.2M | $336.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.2M | $576.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.3M | $521.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.1M | $485.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.9M | $685.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $233.7M | $444.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.3M | $365.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $220.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $214.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $209.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $216.1M | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $446.5M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $459.1M | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $446.7M | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $425.3M | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $396.0M | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $413.8M | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $409.2M | $9.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $417.0M | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | 9.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.02× | 11.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.0M | $208.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.6M | $192.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.9% | 9.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.89× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $60.5M | $187.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.5M | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.6M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $-89.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $565.0K | $351.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.1M | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.0M | $123.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $-79.0M |
| Q4 25 | $6.6M | $192.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.2M | $104.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5M | $-94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $230.0K | $346.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.8M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $117.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $-87.0M |
| Q4 25 | 14.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.0% | -6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.0% | -5.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.89× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.46× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.12× | 6.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.05× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MITK
| Fraud And Identity Solutions | $25.5M | 58% |
| License | $13.9M | 31% |
| Fraud And Identity Solutions Software License And Support | $3.9M | 9% |
| Professional Services And Other | $1.2M | 3% |
XRX
| Other | $596.0M | 29% |
| Manufactured Product Other | $485.0M | 24% |
| Supplies Paper And Other Sales | $483.0M | 24% |
| IT Solutions Segment | $155.0M | 8% |
| CA | $128.0M | 6% |
| IT Products | $100.0M | 5% |
| Rental And Other | $52.0M | 3% |
| Financial Service | $29.0M | 1% |