vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and Rumble Inc. (RUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rumble Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($27.1M vs $20.4M, roughly 1.3× TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 65.0% vs -120.8%, a 185.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs -10.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Rumble Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.2% CAGR vs 9.1%).
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust managed by global alternative asset firm TPG. It primarily invests in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, performing and non-performing mortgage loans, and other credit-linked real estate assets, with its core market being the United States. It generates returns via net interest income from holdings and strategic asset disposition gains.
Rumble is a Canadian-American online video platform, web hosting, and cloud services business headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with its U.S. headquarters in Longboat Key, Florida. It was founded in 2013 by Chris Pavlovski, a Canadian technology entrepreneur. Rumble's cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American conservative and far-right users. Rumble has been described as "alt-tech".
MITT vs RUM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.4M | $27.1M |
| Net Profit | $13.3M | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | 67.1% | -131.1% |
| Net Margin | 65.0% | -120.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.7% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.0% | 86.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.27 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.4M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.5M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.8M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.9M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.4M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.2M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $-236.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6M | $-31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.9M | $-43.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -79.5% |
| Q4 25 | 67.1% | -131.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -113.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.6% | -153.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.7% | -80.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | -172.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -197.4% |
| Q4 25 | 65.0% | -120.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 102.5% | -65.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.9% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.2% | -783.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 111.3% | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | -119.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 121.6% | -244.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.27 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.47 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.30 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.55 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $57.8M | $237.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $560.7M | $274.8M |
| Total Assets | $8.7B | $336.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $57.8M | $237.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.0M | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.5M | $301.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.7M | $114.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.5M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.9M | $154.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.3M | $183.8M |
| Q4 25 | $560.7M | $274.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $559.8M | $302.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $536.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $543.9M | $339.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $543.4M | $-63.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.1M | $166.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.5M | $192.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $539.6M | $210.7M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | $336.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $367.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $391.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $217.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $243.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4B | $263.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $59.6M | $-29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -117.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.48× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-70.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $59.6M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0M | $-33.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-34.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -61.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -79.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -102.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -193.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.57× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MITT
Segment breakdown not available.
RUM
| Audience Monetization | $23.8M | 88% |
| Other Initiatives | $3.3M | 12% |
